NASA Sounds Red Alert over Solar Flare that Nearly Wiped out Human Civilization

 

THAT sun, up in THAT sky? Attacking us?  LOL  Whose side are you on, Mike?

I don’t think Mike Adams has researched this topic fully, or he wouldn’t be sharing information like this.

If you believe anything NASA says, I have a splendid piece of ocean-front property here in the Arizona desert to sell you.

“According to shocking new research published by NASA”.  They just discovered this, eh?

The DRAMA! Can you STAND it? They just never give up, do they?

In case anyone lands here who isn’t aware of what’s REALLY going on…

Any ‘pulse’ that hits us is not from that sun; it’s either from the cabal’s secret space weapons—or it’s the pulse sent by Source that launches “The Event”—the end of the New World Order and Humanity’s liberation.

NASA is a lying, fear-mongering, government agency that is acting out of fear itself, because they are doomed.

They know the allies have destroyed the cabal’s escape route (the sun) and they just keep the fairy tales coming to spread fear and despair in Humanity and to cover up the fact that the feds are now reduced to quaking masses of nerves in their last moments before incarceration.

If you listened to SecureTeam10’s interview with the NASA contractor, NASA is basically shut down. They ran in terror when they learned those massive, L-shaped ships docked on the back side of the moon… where they now lurk… waiting… to come and GET THEM! LOL   There’s some REAL drama for you.

If you haven’t already, you must watch the video, “The Lie NASA Told; The Ultimate Demise of the NWO”—and watch the improved audio version so you can hear every word. Then watch, “The Destruction of the Papal Key”, improved audio version, and then “Ed is Dead” and you’ll understand why this article is so amusing.

You can also do a search on “sun, images, bpearthwatch” and you’ll get videos of the strange goings-on around our “sun”, which is actually a “device”—videos from which NASA removed choice sections to hide what’s been happening—but not until AFTER Jessie had recorded the activity. NASA is a joke.  A very bad joke. 

And perhaps worse than NASA’s doctored images, are the pathetic attempts by so-called experts to explain away the various anomalies the above YouTubers have shown us over the past several months.  Yes, the shills are out in full force to hide the truth, but the truth is already out and waiting to be discovered by the masses.  ~ BP

pulsating beam from space craft hits sun; image removed by NASA Photo Credit: BPEarthwatch.com

 

NASA sounds red alert over solar flare that nearly wiped out human civilization two summers ago

From Natural News – Mike Adams

(NaturalNews) The news you are about to read should be front page news everywhere. There is arguably nothing more important to humanity’s survival than the alarming facts presented in this report from NASA, yet most of the world pretends this event never happened in 2012, and they falsely assume it won’t happen again.

They are wrong. According to shocking new research published by NASA, each decade there is roughly a 12% chance of a near-wipeout of humanity’s high-tech civilization. In fact, one such event nearly wiped out technology across the planet during the summer of 2012.

“A powerful coronal mass ejection (CME) tore through Earth orbit on July 23, 2012,” reports NASA.gov. (1) “If the eruption had occurred only one week earlier, Earth would have been in the line of fire.”

NASA goes on to report:

Analysts believe that a direct hit by an extreme CME such as the one that missed Earth in July 2012 could cause widespread power blackouts, disabling everything that plugs into a wall socket. Most people wouldn’t even be able to flush their toilet because urban water supplies largely rely on electric pumps.

Almost everything on Earth with a circuit board would be fried

NASA’s description of the consequences of an “extreme CME” (Coronal Mass Ejection) just barely begins to paint the real picture of what such an event would cause. Here’s a more detailed picture of what we would really see unfold:

• Nearly all circuit boards containing microelectronics would be fried, causing across-the-board failures of nearly all communications including cell phone towers, internet systems, radios, computers and mobile devices. And yes, your mobile devices will be long gone, too.

• Nearly all forms of motorized transportation relying on complex integrated circuit boards would be rendered unusable. Some late model automobiles and airplanes might be immune to these effects, but most newer cars, airplanes and ocean vessels would be rendered inoperable. There are some very valuable discussions on this topic at www.SurvivalBlog.com

• Nearly all transportation and delivery of food, water and fuel would immediately cease.

• The power grid would go down and stay down. Nearly all systems dependent on power would cease to function. This includes your TV, meaning you won’t be able to turn on CNN to tell you what just happened. Shockingly, people will have to think for themselves.

• Cities around the world would almost immediately fall into total panic and chaos as food, water, fuel and electricity are all cut off. This would set off a wave of desperation, violence, starvation and infectious disease.

• All forms of electronic commerce would cease to function, including EBT cards, ATMs, credit cards and most banking operations. Commerce would effectively grind to a halt.

• As all this is happening, hundreds of nuclear power plants across North America would run out of backup diesel fuel for their generators, causing cooling pump failures and leading to a cascading series of nuclear meltdowns equivalent to hundreds of Fukushima disasters. This might render much of the continent uninhabitable by humans for centuries, if not millennia.

• Interestingly, some of the things that would still work just fine after all this would be:
– Low-tech or “no tech” devices such as old diesel engines and farm implements
– Wood-burning stoves
– Garden seeds
– Firearms
– Gold and silver
– Horse and plow

Essentially, life would be thrust back into the 19th century. The Amish would be King, in other words.

19th-century technology cannot support 7 billion people

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that 19th-century technology cannot support the world’s current population of 7 billion people.

The world population in the year 1850 hovered at just over one billion people. (2)

The world’s current population of over 7 billion people is only made possible by food production and transportation systems which depend heavily on complex electronics. Even the modern tractors that produce food are dependent on electronics and GPS systems. The fuel they burn and the parts they consume must be created and then delivered from thousands of miles away.

Food refrigeration, storage, manufacturing and retailing all depends on a complex infrastructure built on integrated circuits. NASA says there is a 12% chance every decade that this entire infrastructure will be wiped out in an instant.

“How many others of this scale have just happened to miss Earth and our space detection systems?” asks Daniel Baker of the University of Colorado. “This is a pressing question that needs answers. “We need to be prepared.” (1)

But we are not prepared

Consider, for a moment, the enormity of this threat to human civilization. Each year there is over a 1% chance of a MCE event which would destroy the power grid, fry most electronics across the planet, and plunge human civilization into the 19th century in terms of technology.

“Initially, I was quite surprised that the odds were so high,” stated Pete Riley of Predictive Science Inc., who published a February, 2014 paper in Space Weather. (1) “But the statistics appear to be correct… It is a sobering figure.”

The odds of human civilization being plunged back into a pre-technology era are not in dispute. Every day that goes by is another roll of the dice, and a direct hit on the planet by a massive CME is mathematically inevitable.

On a larger time scale, in fact, large solar flares might be viewed as a kind of “galactic rebooting” of inhabited planets, humbling civilizations back into the pre-electronics era and causing a massive die-off of the unprepared.

Almost no one is prepared for the reality of “direct hit” solar flares

Today on planet Earth, almost no one is prepared for this. Everybody is too focused on their own problems or ambitions to think about the risk of solar flares. After all, there are political ambitions to pursue, corporate stocks to trade and shiny new cars (or hand bags) to be acquired.

There are wars to be fought, housing developments to be constructed and water wells to be drilled.

Everyone is so focused on their own narrow goals or ambitions that almost nobody looks skyward at the sun and says, “That object is repeatedly sending out large bursts of energy that could blast us back into the Agrarian Age.”

And so nothing gets done to protect the national power grid from such events, even though such protections could be installed for only about $2 billion in the U.S. Nothing gets done to shift away from nuclear power facilities or protect their backup generators from solar flares or EMP weapons, and so nuclear power plants remain ticking time bombs capable of unleashing a nuclear apocalypse.

Modern humans have forgotten how to live without electronics

Not surprisingly, humanity is blindly marching into a future of its own demise. By relying so heavily on computerized systems for the production and delivery of electricity, food, water, fuel and supplies, human civilization has placed itself in a non-survivable scenario.

Even if a large percentage of the population wanted to survive following a global electronics wipeout, most people have no real-world skills anymore. They don’t know how to farm, how to ranch animals, how to grow a garden or how to live off the land. All the skills of the Information Age become instantly useless once a massive solar flare wipes out the electronics.

How many people are left who can navigate a street map without using GPS? How many people know how to start a fire in a wood burning stove? How many people purchase books in hard copy format anymore? (Trust me when I say all those survival books you bought on Amazon Kindle won’t be much good after a solar flare wipeout.)

Humans are not wired to process long-term risks

To understand this even better, step back and take an honest look at your own behavior. After reading this article and realizing it’s 100% true and based on a real announcement from NASA, what will you do about it?

Over 99 percent of the people who read this article will do nothing different. They will go back to their lives in the city, working their jobs, paying their rent, and perhaps saying to themselves, “Wow, solar flare. That’s interesting.”

It doesn’t sink in because humans are not wired to process long-term risks. Humans are wired to run from tigers and evade imminent physical danger, but they have almost no innate cognitive ability to understand large systemic risks.

That’s why people don’t understand the reality of the coming global debt collapse. They don’t grasp the coming global water collapse. They are unable to recognize the inherent fragility of a highly specialized society with few redundancies.

The ability to ignore these very large systemic risks is sometimes called a “normalcy bias.” That terms refers to the irrational belief that things will stay the way they are because they’ve always been that way. If tap water always comes out of the tap, day after day, year after year, the human mind will automatically assume water automagically will comes out of that same tap forever.

When the solar flare hits, few will know what happened

Nearly all humans alive today falsely assume that human civilization is robust and redundant. They do not understand how their food, water, air conditioning, economic activities and personal safety are all heavily dependent on complex electronic devices which will not survive a sufficiently large solar flare.

As a result, few people will understand what’s really happening when the CME strikes. Suddenly, nearly all electronic devices will simultaneously cease to function. The world will fall silent, and within minutes the panic will begin.

Thrust back into the 19th century, the world will likely see a loss of billions of lives. Under-developed agricultural nations like Papua New Guinea will experience the highest survival rates, and rural families will vastly out-live urban dwellers across every nation. Those people who can grow their own food, defend their property against looters and safeguard their health with natural remedies will vastly out-live those who can’t.

This scenario is precisely what nearly unfolded in the summer of 2012. And there is no question that it will happen to our civilization sooner or later. With a 12% chance of a direct hit every decade, it’s likely to be “sooner” rather than “later.”

 

 

 

HAARP/Chemtrails Weapons of Mass Destruction Slide Show

pentagram chemtrailsLast week the image at left greeted us as we embarked on our morning walk; this, after a couple of days of clear blue. It resembles the better part of a pentagram, doesn’t it?

Alfred Webre shared the following slideshow on his Exopolitics site and it’s an excellent presentation for the newly-initiated as well as old timer Truthers.

You can move from slide to slide at your own pace, no audio.

It goes into the multiple purposes behind the Chemtrails program, the breakdown of the content of the aerosols, symptoms resulting, and includes the mention of “domestic” UFOs masked via hologram as airline tankers, and the probable engagement of Extraterrestrial UFOs to counter the assault on Humanity—and a lot more.

Interesting… the part about UFOs made to look like planes because someone mentioned in a video I watched recently that the plane “shimmered” or something to that effect, as though it were plasma, or a mirage, which it did. A hologram might explain that.

Cobra mentioned recently that another reason for the chemtrails program is to render the atmosphere inhospitable to the ETs, making it difficult to land their craft.  ~ BP

 

HAARP/Chemtrails WMD: Exposing a Spiritual, Mass Mind-Control, and Planetary Assault

Use this link to reach the slide show.

 

An Article About Us—the Tin-Foil Hat Conspiracists!

Did you know…

“People who more strongly believed in independent research and analysis were significantly less likely to use sunscreen or have an annual medical checkup.” ?

Guilty. Although I live in Arizona where the sun is exceptionally strong and well over 100 degrees F. for over 4 months, I never use sunscreen any more.

I haven’t been to a doctor in years, and I enjoy exceptionally good health. I take no drugs, use only natural and herbal remedies if necessary, and eat the healthiest food I can, don’t cook in the microwave, rarely use a cell phone, yada, yada, yada—without getting anal or obsessive about any of it.

The establishment is doing its best to quash our need to research and establish in our own minds what reality is, but it’s a losing battle. Ironically, the Internet and alternative media were their downfall.

The law of supply and demand dictates that if there were no call for alternative and independent media, there would be none. We can see the number of websites, blogs and YouTube channels exploding. That speaks volumes. And many independent media stations are so professional in appearance and discussion now that it’s difficult to tell they’re not primary network sites.

In fact, how many of us have completely stopped watching mainstream news altogether because it’s so laughable? So utterly INcredible? So manufactured?

Fortunately, more and more people are hearing the call to discover what’s really going on and as they say below, it’s contagious. The cabal and all their cronies are going down, and I think some of us are now enjoying wearing the badge of honour called “Conspiracy Theorist” because it means we use our head and refuse to be cattle. Research shows we’re not “ignorant” or “unstable”. Good to know. Woo-hoo!

I fully admit that most of what the government conspires to do is terribly difficult to swallow—until you open your eyes and see the evidence—and then it’s slap on the forehead time.

We know it’s not rocket science to recognize that if  good presidents continue to be assassinated, taxes go up while services go down, your government is hiding things and passing legislation in the middle of  the night, troops are continually sent out to war, that if the current administration is making changes that snatch our rights and freedoms out from under us, are trying to remove guns from the masses and generally trampling the Constitution—that the federal government is in it for themselves—not representing The People and our mandates. They’ve gone rogue.

The time to look away is long past and our countrymen will be jarred awake very soon—and to whom will they look for answers and guidance? Uh-huh… and won’t we be popular then?  Yes, V-Day (Vindication Day) is on the way, my friends!  ~ BP

https://i1.wp.com/consciouslifenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/conspiracy_theorist_report-263x1641.jpg

Cracking the “Conspiracy Theories’” Psycholinguistic Code: The Witch Hunt against Independent Research and Analysis

A new crusade appears to be underway to target independent research and analysis available via alternative news media. This March saw the release of “cognitive infiltration” advocate Cass Sunstein’s new book, Conspiracy Theories and Other Dangerous Ideas. In April, the confirmed federal intelligence-gathering arm, Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), released a new report, “Agenda 21: The UN, Sustainability, and Right Wing Conspiracy Theory.” Most recently, Newsweek magazine carried a cover story, titled, “The Plots to Destroy America: Conspiracy Theories Are a Clear and Present Danger.”

As its discourse suggests, this propaganda campaign is using the now familiar “conspiracy theory” label, as outlined in Central Intelligence Agency Document 1035-960, the 1967 memo laying out a strategy for CIA “media assets” to counter criticism of the Warren Commission and attack independent investigators of President John F. Kennedy’s assassination. At that time the targets included attorney Mark Lane and New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison, who were routinely defamed and lampooned in major US news outlets.

Declassified government documents have proven Lane and Garrison’s allegations of CIA-involvement in the assassination largely accurate. Nevertheless, the prospect of being subject to the conspiracy theorist smear remains a potent weapon for intimidating authors, journalists, and scholars from interrogating complex events, policies, and other potentially controversial subject matter.

As the title of Newsweek’s feature story indicates, a primary element of contemporary propaganda campaigns using the conspiracy theory/ist label is to suggest that citizens’ distrust of government imperatives and activities tends toward violent action. The “conspiracy theorist” term is intentionally conflated with “conspiracist,” thus linking the two in the mass mind. Images of Lee Harvey Oswald, Timothy McVeigh, and Osama bin Laden are subtly invoked when the magic terms are referenced. In reality, it is typically Western governments using their police or military who prove the foremost purveyors of violence and the threat of violence—both domestically and abroad.

In his Newsweek article, author and journalist Kurt Eichenwald selectively employs the assertions of the SPLC, Sunstein, and a handful of social scientists to postulate in Orwellian fashion that independent research and analysis of the United Nations’ Agenda 21, the anti-educational thrust of “Common Core,” the dangers of vaccine injury and water fluoridation, and September 11—all important policies and issues worthy of serious study and concern—are a “contagion” to the body politic.

In a functioning public, honest academics and journalists would uninhibitedly delve into these and similar problems–GMOs, state-sponsored terrorism, the dangers of non-ionizing radiation– particularly since such phenomena pose grave threats to both popular sovereignty and self determination. Such intellectuals would then provide important findings to foster vigorous public debate.

Absent this, segments of the populace still capable of critical thought are inclined to access and probe information that leads them to question bureaucratic edicts and, in some cases, suggest a potentially broader political agenda. In today’s world, however, such research projects carried out by the hoi polloi that are expressly reserved for government or foundation-funded technocrats “’distort the debate that is crucial to democracy,’” says Dartmouth political scientist Brendan Nyhan.

With the above in mind, a simple yet instructive exercise in illustrating the psycholinguistic feature of the conspiracy theory propaganda technique is to replace “conspiracy theories/ists” with the phrase, “independent research and analysis,” or “independent researchers.” Let us apply this to some passages from Eichenwald’s recent Newsweek piece.

For example, “Psychological research has shown that the only trait that consistently indicates the probability someone will believe in conspiracy theories independent research and analysis is if that person believes in other conspiracy theories independent research and analysis,” Eichenwald sagely concludes.

“One of the most common ways of introducing conspiracy theories independent research and analysis is to ‘just ask questions’ about an official account,’’’ says Karen Douglas, co-editor of the British Journal of Social Psychology and a senior academic … at Britain’s University of Kent.”

In fact, substituting the phrases accordingly throughout the article significantly neutralizes its overall propagandistic effect.

Researchers agree; independent research and analysis are espoused by people at every level of society seeking ways of calming the chaos of life, sometimes by simply reinforcing convictions.

While the growth in the number of news outlets has helped spread independent research and analysis, it doesn’t compare to the impact of social media and the Internet, experts say.

9/11 conspiracy theorists independent researchers protest outside the World Trade Center in 2011 [Photo caption]

“If you have social networks of people who are talking with one another, you can have independent research and analysis spread in a hurry,’’ says Cass Sunstein, a professor at Harvard Law School … “It literally is as if it was contagious.”

While some may dismiss independent researchers as ignorant or unstable, research has shown that to be false. “The idea that only dumb people believe this stuff is wrong,’’ says Dartmouth’s Nyhan.

People who more strongly believed in independent research and analysis were significantly less likely to use sunscreen or have an annual medical checkup.

Read the rest of the article…

 

 

What’s Your Go-To Research Site? Wikipedia Exposed

Thanks to Ed Komarek at Extraterrestrial Cultural Center on Facebook.

People love to visit their favourite research web site for a quick look-up on something that interests them, but we’re learning that there are a few popular ones that are not only far from trustworthy for accurate information, they are purposely manipulated to skew facts and deceive the public.

I’ve talked about Snopes before. There are now those exposing Wikipedia in a big way.

Many organizations that have a notable reputation and are favourites of the masses are controlled by the powers-that-were. Wal-Mart, Starbucks, Chase and Bank of America, CNN, MSNBC—the ones that gobble up the little ones and render them obsolete so they have the corner on the market and stand to become our trusted sources—because they’re the ONLY sources. What seem like choices are really all the same owners.

We need to be wary of where our information and services come from. We could be feeding the dragon that’s about to consume us. Did you contribute to Wikipedia’s fund raising requests? 

The controllers have been lying to us and covering up the truth about every topic imaginable throughout the history of mankind, and they’re still doing it.  ~ BP

Scientist Says Wikipedia Wants to Control Information, Lacks Objectivity and Abuses Its Readership

23 April, 2014

MessageToEagle.com – Guerrilla Skepticism on Wikipedia is growing. Wikipedia has now been accused of controlling information, filtering out unwanted science material and abusing its readership.

One of Wikipedia’s goals is to improve skeptical content .

Journalists, researchers and scientists avoid using Wikipedia because it is an unreliable source. However, the general public uses the site as source to learn more on a variety of topics.

But just how reliable is Wikipedia and what’s really going on behind the scenes?

A very interesting article appeared recently on Epoch Times in which Tara MacIsaac elaborates on the editing war that is currently taking place at Wikipedia.

According to the Epoch Times “A team of activists under the label “Guerrilla Skepticism on Wikipedia” are making concerted efforts to change science content on Wikipedia. Some are concerned this group could skew public perception of scientific principles and studies.

The Guerrillas started their work not long after so-called “Climategate” scandal in 2009. Green Party activist William Connolley created or rewrote 5,428 articles on Wikipedia, including many related to the politics of global warming and scientists whose views did not correspond to his own on the issue, according to reporting by Lawrence Solomon of the National Post. When Connolley became a Wikipedia website administrator, he removed 500 articles and barred more than 2,000 contributors “who ran afoul of him,” wrote Solomon.

 

Oxford University researchers found in a recent study that the two topics fueling the most heated editing wars on Wikipedia are Israel and God. “Everyone knows that there are opposing views on politics and religion, and many people recognize a biased account when they see it. But in the realm of science, things are different,” wrote Dr. Rupert Sheldrake, a biochemist and author educated at Cambridge University and Harvard who is known for his controversial theories.

“Most people have no scientific expertise and believe that science is objective,” he said on his website. But he argues that strict materialism-the ideology of the Guerrilla Skepticism team-is a subjective worldview that does not maintain the supposed objectivity of science.

He accuses the Guerrilla Skepticism team of systematically abusing the trust of the Wikipedia readership. Susan Gerbik runs the team of almost 100, said Sheldrake, and “their aim is to ‘control information’ … Ms Gerbik glories in the power that she and her warriors wield.”

 


Guerrilla Skepticism’s website states: “The mission of the Guerrilla Skepticism editing team is to improve skeptical content on Wikipedia. We do this by improving pages of our skeptic spokespeople, providing noteworthy citations, and removing the unsourced claims from paranormal and pseudoscientific pages.”

“Skepticism is a normal, healthy attitude of doubt,” Sheldrake wrote. “Unfortunately it can also be used as a weapon to attack opponents. In scientific and medical contexts, organized skepticism is a crusade to propagate scientific materialism.”

He said: “Fortunately, a few editors arguing for a more neutral point of view have not yet been bullied into silence. An editing war is raging as you read this.”

Russell Targ

Russel Targ, a physicist and author who was a pioneer in the development of the laser, and cofounder of the Stanford Research Institute’s investigation into psychic abilities in the 1970s and 1980s wrote shared the his reflections on what is happening with Wikipedia.

 

“For many years I had a pretty well balanced biography page on Wikipedia. I am now 80 years old, and had several scientific careers. I was a pioneer in the earliest development of the laser from 1957 to 1972. I was co-founder of an ESP research program at SRI from 1972 to 1982. And I worked for 12 years with Lockheed and NASA on airborne laser wind measurements. The Wiki editors have removed all trace of my 27 years in lasers, and I cannot put back one word.The editors, who mindlessly and passionately hate ESP, have trashed any positive aspects of our $20 million, 23 year program at SRI. Those numbers, in particular, are always removed. The negative comments are now more than three times the length of my brief bio. I cannot even mention that my wife was the sister of Bobby Fischer, former world chess champion.

As I try to repair these deletions, I have been banned from editing my bio. As I see how the editing process works at Wikipedia, I would not trust anything at all that I read there. Because of this mad prejudice, I think Wikipedia has debased itself as an information source.

Warm regards,
Russell Targ”

We will end this article by saying that next time you visit Wikipedia think once or twice about the information you are entitled to read and everything else that you will never be able to be informed about because the site deliberately avoids it.

 

Internet Trolls Really Are Horrible People

Have you ever wondered how those insufferable Internet trolls can live with themselves? This article may shed light on the phenomenon.

It takes a “special”kind of person to do that job—and they ARE paid in many cases to discredit information the controllers don’t want to get out or don’t want us to believe.

They’re laughable, really, and think they’re pretty hot stuff. If I can easily leave a comment on sites where I see their comments, I call them out and tell them to leave. I feel sorry for them. They don’t even know they’re abnormal.  ~ BP

The Internet is sadists' playground.

The Internet is sadists’ playground

In the past few years, the science of Internet trollology has made some strides. Last year, for instance, we learned that by hurling insults and inciting discord in online comment sections, so-called Internet trolls (who are frequently anonymous) have a polarizing effect on audiences, leading to politicization, rather than deeper understanding of scientific topics.

That’s bad, but it’s nothing compared with what a new psychology paper has to say about the personalities of trolls themselves. The research, conducted by Erin Buckels of the University of Manitoba and two colleagues, sought to directly investigate whether people who engage in trolling are characterized by personality traits that fall in the so-called Dark Tetrad: Machiavellianism (willingness to manipulate and deceive others), narcissism (egotism and self-obsession), psychopathy (the lack of remorse and empathy), and sadism (pleasure in the suffering of others).

It is hard to underplay the results: The study found correlations, sometimes quite significant, between these traits and trolling behavior. What’s more, it also found a relationship between all Dark Tetrad traits (except for narcissism) and the overall time that an individual spent, per day, commenting on the Internet.

In the study, trolls were identified in a variety of ways. One was by simply asking survey participants what they “enjoyed doing most” when on online comment sites, offering five options: “debating issues that are important to you,” “chatting with others,” “making new friends,” “trolling others,” and “other.” Here’s how different responses about these Internet commenting preferences matched up with responses to questions designed to identify Dark Tetrad traits:

E.E. Buckels et al, "Trolls just want to have fun," Personality and Individual Differences, 2014.
E.E. Buckels et al, “Trolls just want to have fun,” Personality and Individual Differences, 2014.

 

To be sure, only 5.6 percent of survey respondents actually specified that they enjoyed “trolling.” By contrast, 41.3 percent of Internet users were “non-commenters,” meaning they didn’t like engaging online at all. So trolls are, as has often been suspected, a minority of online commenters, and an even smaller minority of overall Internet users.

The researchers conducted multiple studies, using samples from Amazon’s Mechanical Turk but also of college students, to try to understand why the act of trolling seems to attract this type of personality. They even constructed their own survey instrument, which they dubbed the Global Assessment of Internet Trolling, or GAIT, containing the following items:

I have sent people to shock websites for the lulz.

I like to troll people in forums or the comments section of websites.

I enjoy griefing other players in multiplayer games.

The more beautiful and pure a thing is, the more satisfying it is to corrupt.

Yes, some people actually say they agree with such statements. And again, doing so was correlated with sadism in its various forms, with psychopathy, and with Machiavellianism. Overall, the authors found that the relationship between sadism and trolling was the strongest, and that indeed, sadists appear to troll because they find it pleasurable. “Both trolls and sadists feel sadistic glee at the distress of others,” they wrote. “Sadists just want to have fun … and the Internet is their playground!”

The study comes as websites, particularly at major media outlets, are increasingly weighing steps to rein in trollish behavior. Last year Popular Science did away with its comments sections completely, citing research on the deleterious effects of trolling, and YouTube also took measures to rein in trolling.

But study author Buckels actually isn’t sure that fix is a realistic one. “Because the behaviors are intrinsically motivating for sadists, comment moderators will likely have a difficult time curbing trolling with punishments (e.g., banning users),” she said by email. “Ultimately, the allure of trolling may be too strong for sadists, who presumably have limited opportunities to express their sadistic interests in a socially-desirable manner.”

Source

 

Health Authorities Now Admit Severe Side Effects of Vaccination: Graphic Pictures & Videos

Thanks, Patrick.  Hard to believe they are purposely releasing this stuff and using on children, isn’t it? Accidentally on purpose…  ~ BP

Swine Flu, Pandemrix and Narcolepsy

by Karin Munsterhjelm-Ahumada, M.D.

(OMNS, March 20, 2012) The swine flu pandemic of 2009 was caused by a type A influenza (H1N1) virus. This virus was originally referred to as “swine flu” because many of the genes of this new virus were very similar to influenza viruses that normally occur in pigs in North America. The H1N1 virus is genetically similar to the 1918 pandemic virus, as determined from victims of the latter who were buried, and later disinterred, in Svalbard. It was responsible for most of the outbreaks up until 1956 and then disappeared.

However, this new virus was actually quite different from the typical swine flu viruses. This virus first caused illness in Mexico and the United States in March and April, 2009. This novel H1N1 flu spread from person to person, unlike typical swine flu. In 2009 vaccines were being developed for the prevention of swine flu in humans.http://www.medterms.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=99584

Shingles Vaccination Side Effects

On 11 June 2009, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared that the swine flu had developed into a full scale world epidemic – a pandemic alert to Phase 6. Margaret Chan, the Director-General of WHO, commented on the situation in a somewhat ambiguous way. While stressing that the swine flu had reached a serious pandemic level, she declared later in the same statement that the illness seemed to be mild and that most of the patients would recover without medical intervention. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2009/h1n1_pandemic_phase6_20090611/en/index.html

The world chose to listen to the first part of her message.

Two pharmaceutical companies GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and Novartis had, under considerable time pressure, developed a vaccine against the swine flu. Since the cultivation of an adequate amount of virus to generate the vaccine requires time, GSK and Novartis decided to formulate a weaker vaccine but strenghten it with an adjuvant that contains squalene. Immunologic adjuvants are substances, administered in conjunction with a vaccine, that stimulate the immune system and increase the response to the vaccinehttp://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/topics/adjuvants/squalene/questions_and_answers/en/. Although squalene is a natural substance found in methabolic pathways of the body, its inclusion in a vaccine is controversial and it is not in use in the USA.

On 25 September 2009, the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) approved Pandemrix, the swine flu vaccine produced by GSK and Focetria produced by Novartis.http://justthevax.blogspot.com/2009/09/eu-approves-gsk-pandemrix-and-novartis.htmlThe vaccine would be ready for use that October.

In Sweden, Finland, Norway and Iceland, the authorities explicitly set the goal of vaccinating the entire population http://www.svd.se/nyheter/inrikes/massvaccinering-raddade-sex-liv_6851143.svd. In this respect, it is of interest that the governments of these countries, already before the outbreak of the swine flu, had concluded an agreement with GSK, according to which they were assured the delivery of pandemic vaccines, if needed. In addition, the contract stipulated that, in a situation characterized as a pandemic by the WHO, the same Nordic countries would have ten days to decide whether or not to accept delivery of the vaccine in question. Hence, the purpose of the agreement was to assure that the entire populations of these countries would receive vaccinations. Finally, the contract protected GSK from any claim for financial compensation in case the delivered vaccine would have any side effects.

When WHO declared the swine flu to be a Phase 6 pandemic, the agreement referred to above was automatically activated.

rare side effects of vaccination: a one year old child with a case of erythema multiforme. © The Centre for Disease Control and Prevention

Mass vaccination started in Finland and Sweden in October 2009. In order to cover the largest possible percentage of the population, the authorities initiated an enormous public relations campaign, which could be described in terms of a “moral persuasion.” Solidarity became the slogan: “Be vaccinated to protect your fellow citizens.” Those who questioned the vaccination program (small groups of vaccine opponents or just people who were hesitant) were looked upon with disapproval.

In contrast to these vaccine – enthusiastic countries, the politics of vaccination within the rest of the European Union varied immensely among its member states. Poland, for example, decided not to buy vaccines at all due to the strict agreement conditions required by the pharmaceutical companies. Denmark’s order covered only “risk groups”.http://www.svd.se/nyheter/inrikes/svd-granskar-sveriges-vaccinering-mot-svininfluensan_6843475.svd

The expected second wave of the influenza never appeared. The epidemic gradually declined during the first half of 2010. The same year, on 10 August, WHO officially declared the end of the epidemic. The European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) stated that the swine flu was less dangerous and had a lower mortality rate than the seasonal influenza. Thus, apparently the swine flu would not have been a dangerous epidemic even without the mass vaccination. Interestingly, also that same year, vitamin D was shown to prevent influenza in children. (1)

In Sweden, 60% of the population had been vaccinated, while in Finland 50% was covered. In contrast, the figures in Germany and Poland were only 8 and 0% respectively. In the history of Swedish health care this pandemic campaign amounted to one of the most expensive ever. Enormous amounts of taxpayer money were at stake.http://www.svd.se/nyheter/inrikes/svd-granskar-sveriges-vaccinering-mot-svininfluensan_6843475.svd

Meanwhile, the media had become silent on this issue ; there was no further discussion about the swine flu anymore.

Then the blow came:

“The absolutely worst thing that could happen,” commented Richard Bergström, the Director – General of the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations, EFPIA. “The worst nightmare of both the industry and the health authorities is an illness that turns out to be mild, while the vaccine that was supposed to prevent a dangerous epidemic causes a severe side effect that was previously unknown.” http://www.kostdemokrati.se/nyheter/files/2012/02/SvD-sid-14-19.pdf

In August 2010, Finland reported an increased occurrence of narcolepsy in children and youngsters vaccinated with Pandemrix. On 1 September 2010, Finland stopped all Pandemrix vaccinations.http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/09/10/swine-flu-vaccine-may-have-caused-narcolepsy.aspx

Narcolepsy is a severe chronic neurologic disease that not only results in a disabling fatigue, which typically results in the patient falling asleep anywhere and at any time. It might also lead to panic attacks and a state of exhaustion. For many, the worst consequences are the symptoms of cataplexy. This condition causes the narcolepsy patient, when expressing strong feelings such as laughter or crying, to suddenly lose muscular control. The legs give way, speech gets slurred, the gaze goes unfocused and the person gives the impression of being drunk. In some patients, frightening hallucinations appear when falling asleep or waking up.

On 1 September 2011, the Finnish National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL) admitted, that for Finnish children and youngsters age 4-19, there was a new and obvious connection between Pandemrix and narcolepsy. As stated in THL’s press release, “The increased risk associated with vaccination amounted to six cases of narcolepsy per 100,000 persons vaccinated in the 4-19 age group during the eight months following vaccination. This was 12.7 times the risk of a person in the same age group who had not been vaccinated.” http://www.thl.fi/en_US/web/en/pressrelease?id=26352 This statement was made almost exactly two years after the THL’s earlier statement made in the midst of the swine flu hysteria that everyone should be vaccinated with Pandemrix and that it would be safe. In that original statement, the director of the THL emphasized that the squalene adjuvant could increase the side effects of the vaccine to some extent. However, he stated, these side effects would not be dangerous. http://www.tohtori.fi/?page=5833192&id=0169960

In Sweden, at least 150 children are now suffering from narcolepsy caused by Pandemrix vaccine. In Finland, the number is approximately 100. In both countries the number is probably growing. Narcolepsy is a disease with lifetime consequences, and the risk that Pandremix may have caused other neurological illnesses has not yet been excluded. Many have already began to compare this tragedy with the thalidomide catastrophe.http://www.svd.se/nyheter/inrikes/medicinsk-tragedi-med-ett-absurt-slut_6861775.svd

No European countries had a particularly high rate of deaths due to the swine flue. Germany had the same death rate as Sweden, which was 0.31/100 000, although Sweden vaccinated 60% and Germany only 8%. This implies that the vaccine did little to prevent deaths. The responsible authorities have not yet commented on this matter of fact. http://www.svd.se/nyheter/inrikes/massvaccinering-raddade-sex-liv_6851143.svd

Last year the Finnish government promised full compensation for those who have developed narcolepsy as a consequence of the vaccination.http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-10-05/finnish-government-to-compensate-pandemrix-narcolepsy-victims.html. While Sweden did, indeed, follow the Finnish THL in admitting the connection between the vaccine and the disease, the Swedish authorities have not yet decided whether and how to provide appropriate compensation.

In February 2012, Svenska Dagbladet, a widely read newspaper in Sweden, presented an informative and accurate series of articles on this theme. They describe some of the affected children narrating how difficult it is to live with narcolepsyhttp://www.svd.se/nyheter/multimedia/artikel_6840743.svd

According to the authorities, much research is still underway concerning the details of the vaccine injury. Taking the pressure from the public and the affected families into account, it will be difficult for them to avoid carrying out a thorough investigation. Let’s hope so.

See the videos

Why Those Promised Cures for Diseases Will Never Come from Pharmaceutical Research

Money is the biggest reason for everything Big Pharma does. (That and population control) They dish out exciting new “cures” and we gobble them up; getting sicker and sicker. The masses never seem to connect the dots.  There are cures for nearly every disease, particularly the man-made ones, but they are suppressed, just as several sources of free energy are suppressed, but things they are a-changing…  ~ BP

What You Need to Know About the Fraudulent Nature of the Pharmaceutical Investment Business With Disease

The Laws of the Pharmaceutical Business with Disease

Some people may say that the pharmaceutical industry cannot be that bad. Unfortunately, it is. Fortunately, however, it is very easy for everyone to understand why this industry has such a detrimental effect on millions of human lives.

It is not about individual drugs or individual companies. It is about the principles – the laws – of the pharmaceutical ‘business with disease’. The most important of these laws can be summarized in the following way:

  1. The pharmaceutical industry is not a ‘health industry’, but an ‘investment business’ that thrives on the continuation and expansion of diseases.
  2. The pharmaceutical industry makes more than 500 billion dollars in profits each year – but only as long as disease exist as their markets.
  3. The pharmaceutical industry has built the largest fraud business in human history: it promises health to millions of people, but – instead of providing health – the drug industry delivers ever more diseases, because diseases are the economic basis for the existence of this investment business.
  4. In order to protect their multi-billion dollar disease markets with cardiovascular disease, cancer, AIDS and other diseases, the pharmaceutical industry does everything to maintain these diseases and to avoid their eradication.
  5. The multi-billion ‘merchandise’ of the pharmaceutical industry is synthetic drugs that are patented, in order to ensure huge profits from patent fees. Only newly invented synthetic molecules can be patented, which explains the toxicity and death rate in people taking these drugs.
  6. Building this ‘business with disease’ over the past century, the pharmaceutical industry has raked so much money from this organized fraud that it has become one of the largest and most profitable industries on our planet today.
  7. The pharmaceutical industry strategically invests the multi-billion profits from their global fraud business to infiltrate all sectors of society and influence public opinion around the globe.
  8. To cover the genocidal dimension of its fraud business, the pharmaceutical industry is spending twice the amount of money it spends on research in order to manipulate public opinion and to cover its ‘business with disease’ by spreading the false promise of healthy drugs.
  9. Vitamins, micronutrients and other natural health approaches are the arch-enemies of the pharmaceutical industry, because they are not patentable. Even more importantly, they effectively help prevent and control diseases, because they correct the malfunction of millions of cells in our body as the primary cause of disease. Half a dozen of Nobel prizes have been awarded for scientific breakthroughs in vitamin research – yet all this knowledge has been banned from being applied to medicine in favor of the multi-billion dollar investment business with patented drugs.
  10. Every country has to decide whether it wants to maintain a pharmaceutically oriented healthcare system based on the expansion of diseases – or whether it wants to develop a new healthcare system based on effective, natural health with the goal to prevent and eventually eradicate diseases.

The pharma-fraud business, obviously, is not a naturally grown business. From the very beginning, about a century ago, it was designed and constructed as a giant organized fraud feeding on the health and lives of every man and woman on this planet.

The unscrupulous architects of this largest fraud in the history of mankind are listed below. These stakeholders of the drug cartel and their puppets in medicine, media and politics, active until this day are responsible for more deaths than in all wars of mankind taken together.

The Big Picture

It is sometimes difficult to understand the complex relationships that exist between the key international bodies, governments, trade associations and other entities concerned with health. Awareness of how these bodies fit together and their respective functions is, however, fundamental to understanding the bigger picture and the full extent of the threat to your health posed by this web of interest groups.
More

The History of the Pharma-Cartel

1911, May 15

John D. Rockefeller

The supreme court of the U.S. finds John Rockefeller and his Trust guilty of corruption, illegal business contact and racketeering. As a result of this decision, the entire Rockefeller Standard Oil-Trust, the world’s largest corporation of this time, was sentenced to be dismantled. But Rockefeller was already above the supreme court and did not care about this decision.

1913

In order to disperse public and political pressure on him and other robber-barons Rockefeller uses a trick called “philanthropy”: he uses the illegal gains from his robber-practices in the oil business to launch the Rockefeller Foundation. This tax haven was used to strategically take over the health care sector in the U.S..

The Rockefeller Foundation was the front organization for a new global business venture of Rockefeller and his accomplices. This new venture was called the pharmaceutical investment business. Donation from the Rockefeller Foundation went only to medical schools and hospitals, which had become missionaries of patented pharmaceutical drugs, developed by a new breed of companies, manufacturers of patented, synthetic drugs.

This was also the time, when the first vitamins were discovered. It soon became clear, that these natural molecules had live-saving health benefits and were able to prevent many chronic health conditions. The first books appeared with abandoned research about the health benefits of vitamins. These newly discovered molecules had only one disadvantage: they were non-patentable.
Thus, already in its first years of existence, the pharmaceutical investment business faced a mortal thread: vitamins and other micronutrients promoted as public health programs would prohibit the development of any sizable investment business based on patented drugs. The elimination of this unwanted competition from natural micronutrients became a question of life and death for the pharmaceutical business.

1918

The Rockefeller Foundation uses the Spanish flu epidemic and the media they already controlled at this time, to start a witch hunt on all forms of medicine, which were not covered by their patents.

Within the next 15 years essentially all medical schools in the U.S., most hospitals and the American Medical Association all became pawns of the chess board of Rockefellers strategy to subjugate the entire health care sector under his monopoly of the pharmaceutical investment business.

Disguised as a “Mother Theresa”, the Rockefeller Foundation was also used to conquer foreign countries and entire continents for the pharmaceutical investment business – just as Rockefeller had done it a few decades ago with his petrochemical investment business.

1925

On the other side of the Atlantic, in Germany, the first chemical / pharmaceutical cartel is founded in order to compete with the quest for control of the global drug market by the Rockefeller trust. Lead by German multinationals Bayer, BASF and Hoechst, the I.G. Farben cartel was founded with a total number of employees surpassing 80.000. The race for global control was on.

1929, November 29

The Rockefeller cartel (U.S.A.) and the I.G. Farben cartel (Germany) decided to divide the entire globe into interest spheres, the very same crime, Rockefeller had been sentenced for 18 years earlier, when his trust had divided up the U.S. into “interest zones”.

1932 / 33

The I.G. Farben cartel, equally insatiable, decides no longer to be bound by the 1929 constraints. They support an uprising German politician, who promises I.G. Farben to militarily conquer the world for them. With millions of dollars in election campaign donations, this politician seized power in Germany, turned the German democracy into a dictatorship and kept his promise to launch his conquest war, a war that soon became known as WWII.

In each and every country Hitler’s Wehrmacht invaded, the first act was to rob the chemical, petrochemical and pharmaceutical industries and assign them – free of charge – to the I.G. Farben empire.

1942 – 45

In order to cement its global leadership with patented drugs, the I.G. Farben cartel tests their patented pharmaceutical substances on concentration camp inmates in Auschwitz, Dachau and many other sites. The fees for conducting these inhumane studies were transferred directly from the bank accounts of Bayer, Hoechst and BASF to the bank accounts of the SS, who operated the concentration camps.

1945

I.G. Farben’s plan to take control of the global oil and drug markets has failed. The U.S. and the other allied forces won WWII. While many U.S. and allied soldiers lost their lives, their reward was little compared to the rewards of others. The corporate shares of the losers, I.G. Farben, went to the Rockefeller trust (U.S.A.) and Rothschild / J.P. Morgan (U.K.).

1947

In the Nuremberg war crime tribunal 24 managers from Bayer, BASF, Hoechst and other executives of the I.G. Farben cartel were tried for crimes against humanity, including leading wars of aggression, slavery and mass murder. In his final pleading U.S.-Chief Prosecutor Telford Taylor summarized the crimes committed by these corporate criminals with the following words: “without I.G. Farben, the second World War would not have been possible”.

Amazingly the real culprits for the death of 60 Million people in World War II – the I.G. Farben executives – received the mildest verdicts. Even those executives directly responsible for the crimes in I.G. Auschwitz received a maximum of twelve years in jail. Surprised? Not really.

Nelson Rockefeller

Already in 1944 Nelson Rockefeller had entered the executive branch of U.S. government. He started off as Under-Secretary of State and ended few years later as Special Adviser of President Truman for Special Affairs. In other words at critical junctures of the 20th century, the Rockefeller interests took direct charge. They decided the post war shape of the world and the distribution of its wealth.

Under the influence of the state department, the verdicts in Nuremberg against the I.G. Farben managers can easily be explained. In return for taking over the corporate shares of I.G. Farben and thereby global control of the oil and drug business, Nelson Rockefeller made sure that the real culprits of World War II were not hanged. In fact, they were needed.

1949

The Federal Republic of Germany was founded. This was the first time in history, that the constitution and society of an industrialized nation could be planned and modeled as a fortress of the pharmaceutical investment business – an transatlantic outpost of the Rockefeller interests.

Within a few years the I.G. Farben managers sentenced in Nuremberg were released from jail and put back into their previous positions as stakeholders of the Rockefeller interests. Fritz Ter Meer, sentenced to twelve years in jail for his crimes in Auschwitz, was back as chairman of the board of Germany’s largest pharmaceutical multinational, Bayer. Already in 1963!

1945 – 49

The role of the Rockefeller brothers was not limited to taking over the global monopoly of taking control of the global oil and drug business. They also needed the political framework for this. Under their influence the United Nations were founded already in 1945 in San Francisco. To seize political control of the post war world, they used a trick to fight countries, three of them leading drug export nations, had all the say, while 200 other nations were rendered spectators.

Founded as organizations to allegedly serve the well being of the people of the world, the UN suborganizations, like the World Health Organization (WHO) and World Trade Organization (WTO) soon turned out to be nothing else than the political arms of the global oil and drug interests.

1963

David Rockefeller

On behalf of the Rockefeller interests, the government of the pharmaceutical banana republic Germany spearheaded one of the most infamous efforts ever made within the United Nations. Under the pretense of consumer protection, they launched a four decade long crusade to outlaw vitamin therapies and other natural, non-patentable health approaches for all member countries of the United Nations. The goal was to simply ban any and all competition for the multi-billion dollar business with patented drugs. The plan was simple: copy for the entire world what they had accomplished in America in the 1920s – a monopoly on health care for their investment business with patented drugs.

Since the market place of the pharmaceutical investment business are ongoing diseases, the drugs they developed were not intended to prevent, cure or eradicate diseases. Thus, the goal of this global strategy was to monopolize health for billions of people with pills that nearly cover symptoms but hardly ever address the root cause of disease. The deprivation of billions of people from having access to life saving information about the health benefits of natural health approaches and – at the same time establishing a monopoly with largely ineffective and frequently toxic patented drugs, caused disease and death in genocidal proportions.

This epidemic of unnecessary disability and death by the pharmaceutical business with disease is unparalleled in history.

Linus Pauling and other eminent scientists deserve the credit of having kept the door of knowledge about the health benefits of vitamins and other effective natural health approaches open. If it were not for them, we would be living in a health prison already today, guarded by the gatekeepers of pharmaceutical business with disease in medicine, politics and the media.

Linus Pauling also gets the credit of having identified the significance of my early research in vitamins and cardiovascular disease and having invited me to join him during his last years and to continue his life’s work.

1990 – 92

This years will go into history as the beginning of the end of pharmaceutical business with disease. In a series of scientific publications – for some of them I invited Linus Pauling as co-author – I could identify micronutrient deficiency as the primary cause. These diseases included heart attacks, high blood pressure, diabetic circulatory problems, cancer and even diseases like immune deficiencies, including AIDS.

Like a Sherlock Holmes of science, I traced the real cause of these diseases and found that these causes had been deliberately nebulized or even hidden away from millions of people for one purpose only: to feed the insatiable greed of the pharmaceutical business with disease.

Source