Sierra Leone Govt & Media Repel Free OZONE Ebola Treatment (Threatened by Big Pharma, CIA?)

Koroma SierraLeone Sierra Leone Govt & Media Repel Free OZONE Ebola Treatment! Threatened by Big Pharma, CIA?PP Editor: Are Sierra Leone Authorities and media threatened not to accept and adopt the freely offered Ozone Gas Treatment to battle Ebola successfully? Well, it sure sounds like it. Dr. Robert Rowan whose Ozone gas treatment demonstration was at first generously and affectionately received by medical authorities and even the President, even finding relief through it, has been improperly repelled by Sierra Leone authorities, some of whom have been threatened with job loss! My dear God, is every country ruled by secret interests? Where are the heroes?

robert and terri rowen mds Sierra Leone Govt & Media Repel Free OZONE Ebola Treatment! Threatened by Big Pharma, CIA?It makes me so pissing mad how US Govt. & corporations manipulate, pressure, and even threaten little 3rd world countries! Because they are bent on creating a worldwide “epidemic” to stuff their own pockets and kill as many souls as possible, they are known to resist alternative remedies. Here is someone who sacrifices to help the hundreds sick and even dying, and he gets treated as dirt and resisted. The only possible explanation for this sudden rejection is that these authorities are blackmailed or threatened not to give successful Ozone Gas Treatment any chance whatsoever. Why? Because compared to Western vaccines it is virtually free or very cheap to create Ozone gas and administer it. Here is the latest report and Letter to Sierra Leone’s President Koroma from Dr. Robert Rowen, a sweet Jewish doctor who appears to care for people. PLEASE DO pray for him and the government that they will stand up against the Powers That Be! READ Rowen’s Open Letter to President Koroma from Sierra Leone! (Bolds are ours)


Ebola Battled By Robert Rowen MD With Ozone Therapy In Sierra Leone Update 11-3-14

By  on Monday, November 3rd, 2014

The following letter was sent to President Koroma of Sierra Leone via a key advisor. I have no way of knowing if it was actually placed in his hand, though I know that people VERY close to the President also received it.

October 28, 2014 Dear President Koroma,

First, please let me say that I (and Dr. Robins) felt very honored to have been requested by you to come to Sierra Leone to bring ozone for Ebola. It was a long and hard trip, exhausting hours, but very worthwhile for the amazing reception ozone therapy had with all who attended the lectures and who came for training and even treatment. You should know that in just three weeks of preparation, we received over 32,000 USD in private donations from ozone followers around the world to provide materials and shipping for your people.

Some of your most prominent physicians requested treatment for pain with ozone, for which training Dr. Carew was given freely by me personally in addition to the protocol for Ebola. I encourage you to see a video of people you know at

It might be easier to go to www.youtube/com/user/RobertRowenMD and scroll down to get to it.

Mr. President. We felt even more honored that you met with us in the Statehouse and again at your personal residence. Our admiration for you went up many folds in that you requested to receive a treatment yourself. That you so trusted us so, and put yourself forward to experience it ahead of your People is a testament to your leadership.

That said, you might know of turmoil that occurred over the next days. We had meeting after meeting, negotiating through difficult traffic and roads to meet with ministers on their schedule. Most interestingly, neither the Minister of Health nor his staff, nor those in the Ebola program made attempts to meet with us, OR attend our lectures. Yet they are the ones demanding evidence of medical ozone’s science, safety and benefits!

I commend Dr. Eva Roberts, who came to the lecture skeptical, and seeing the science, she turned over completely, requesting intravenous treatment herself, performing one on me, helping instruct the young doctors in their training and then getting knee treatment from me.

On my sixth day we met with Major Palo Conteh, the Ebola chief. After we explained everything to him, he stated, “I have just one question. Why is this not being done as we speak here?” Dr. Robins and I thought we had cleared our last hurdle, getting his approval.

The next day, I traveled to Hastings with Dr. Carew. While training doctors and nurses EAGER to get the treatment themselves for protection and to move ahead with patients, the Major in charge there got a call from the Assistant Minister of Health. She told him, “Your job will be in danger if you permit ozone therapy for anyone there.” Shortly after, a call came from the Minister of Health, who endorsed the order of the Assistant Minister.

I could not believe what I heard, and, admittedly, I exploded in anger before all assembled there. Mr. President, the directive was not only to deny treatment for patients but also to the staff, risking their lives.

This seemed in direct contramand to your first and prime directive to Dr. Carew – “Protect the staff”. The latter was also my first mission, as without staff, you will lose EVERYONE. Interestingly, the staff competed with each other for treatment. That should be very telling.

I went directly to the National Television to tell the story. One, Mr. Stephen Ngaugah, was on Val’s show and went on and on about how the government is winning the Ebola war. He glorified efforts to do proper burials and body burnings. Not a word about saving lives of the sick.

SierraLeoneNewsDoctorsDie Sierra Leone Govt & Media Repel Free OZONE Ebola Treatment! Threatened by Big Pharma, CIA?

He then went on to castigate me, an invited guest of His Excellency, to come and save lives with ozone. He told me I should stay in America to treat our Ebola patients here rather than “experiment on Africans like guinea pigs.” Mr. President. I will tell you I was very restrained and measured in my response to this horrible insult, directed not only to me, but also to you, the one who invited me. I believe his comment made you to look like a fool.

This self-serving and egotistical man did not have the honor to tell your people that he is earning some $120,000 that he demanded for the job, and he has NO medical background. He is earning more than I am at the moment!!! His riches depend on continued grave digging and DEATH. If a cure were found, he’d soon be out of business.

Now the next morning at about 8:30 am, Dr. Carew got a call from the Foreign Minister. It seems he was worried about his mother up north in an Ebola area. He wanted prophylactic treatment for her and the whole family.

So we have a two-tiered system in your country. Ministers demanding protective ozone treatment for themselves, while the government issues orders denying therapy to those sick and most likely to die. Mr. President, I am a doctor. We came at our own expense to save lives and families.

You have people in government who, in my opinion, are wiling to allow death for money. I believe this is a crime against humanity, and has morphed your nation from the land of “blood diamonds” to the land of “Ebola blood money.”

Next day, I met people on the street who saw the show simply aghast at your government ministers (not at you).

At this time, your ministers will not get treatment with equipment paid for to prove ozone therapy for Ebola victims. I cannot blame Dr. Carew for now deciding to take the project to Liberia. I would do the same thing.

Now, after I returned home, I/we received an email that the ministers want to “negotiate” with us. Negotiate? Over attempting to save lives?

Many people in the Hastings center have likely died as a result of the order– hence my term – ‘Ebola blood money’. I am an American who seemingly cares more about your people than do your health ministers and the NERC director.

Be that as it may, let’s get to “negotiation.”

First, please permit Dr. Carew to guide the young, willing, doctors we trained to go into Hastings and treat the group of 10 newly diagnosed patients with early onset symptoms, as per Phase One in our protocol. This is what is most important to us.

The next order of business, I humbly suggest, is to consider whether the ministers who stopped the treatment should retain their positions, as they are the impediment to saving lives.

There would have been nothing to lose and everything to gain by proceeding with ozone therapy while I was still there to closely monitor and advise. Dr. Robins and myself will now have to do this from across the ocean.

Some of the workers at the airport when I was leaving told me, “All the ministers are very corrupt. But this is Africa! What can we do?” This is the feeling of people on the street.

After this, Dr. Carew, upon receiving adequate, additional supplies from us, will consider treating the Health care workers, government officials and their families.

This was/is a no risk opportunity to put the People first! Imagine how you would be seen worldwide if it does as we expect. And, in the remote chance that it does not, there is nothing lost. No one need know.

We had already proven the treatments safety on the doctors and yourself. Seems NERC director, Mr. Stephen Ngaugah, considers that Ebola itself is not experimenting with the lives of your people, with a 60% death rate. Something is very wrong here.

Also, we are told that untested, thus “experimental” vaccinations and drugs have been and are under development. They are being readied for use on Ebola patients in the stricken African countries. Why is this acceptable and not our treatment?

Upon arriving in America, I learned that Dr. Robins was contacted by, and talked with a group of people, with one having inside information to the health ministry, warning of powerful forces (money) within the ministry, which was bent, on destroying our mission to save lives. This person was truly concerned and feared for the safety of Dr. Robins and Dr. Carew as well as myself.

Mr. President, the only thing Dr. Robins and I requested for our efforts was to return at personal invitation of you and shake your hand when your country is declared Ebola free. You agreed. We made a contract. It appears that the contract has been made impossible by self-serving men/women who will greatly profit by all the millions in world efforts to stem the epidemic.

Thank you for reading this and for considering our recommendations.

Most Respectfully,

Robert Rowen, MD

Howard Robins, D.P.M.

Source


DOES THIS RELATE PERHAPS TO KOROMA’S LINK WITH SOROS? OR BECAUSE OF THE RECENT DEPLOYMENT OF BRITISH TROOPS TO SIERA LEONE, OR BOTH?

Soros Koroma Sierra Leone Govt & Media Repel Free OZONE Ebola Treatment! Threatened by Big Pharma, CIA?

SURGE IN EBOLA CASES COINCIDED WITH ARRIVAL OF BRITISH ARMY MEDICS AND FIRST GSK EBOLA VACCINES

November 4, 2014

  • SURGE IN EBOLA CASES IN SIERRA LEONE BEING USED BY GREAT BRITAIN AS A PRETEXT FOR COLONIAL ERA POWER GRAB
  • 3,000 UK TROOPS TO SET UP MILITARY BLOCKADES DEEP INSIDE SIERRA LEONE TERRITORY
  • UK NAVY SHIPS TO PATROL COAST
  • “From a military perspective ebola is like a biological warfare attack and should be countered accordingly,” UK defense source tells Daily Mail
  • SIERRA LEONE PRESIDENT PUTS DEFENSE MINISTER IN CHARGE OF EBOLA FIGHT

Ebola is spreading up to nine times faster in parts of Sierra Leone than two months ago, a report by the Africa Governance Initiative has said.

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/africa/2014/11/ebola-cases-surge-rural-sierra-leone-2014112221854603455.html

The surge in Ebola cases in Sierra Leone comes after a massive deployment of British army personnel, including, medics to help the MSF and Red Cross.

The UK military deployment started at the beginning of September shortly after British pharmaceutical company GSK announced that it would start manufacturing  untested Ebola vaccines at the end of August for immediate use.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-treatment-centre-to-tackle-ebola-in-sierra-leone

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2748368/UK-troops-medical-staff-set-62-bed-Ebola-treatment-centre-Sierra-Leone.html

The British government is also supporting the GSK Ebola vaccine trials, which began at the end of August.

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/aug/28/gsk-to-testing-ebola-vaccine-humans

In response to the Ebola surge, the British army is planning to send 3,000 UK troops into Sierra Leone to set up military blockades to restrict movement in towns and villages deep inside Sierra Leone, reports the Daily Mail.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2798713/3-000-uk-troops-germ-warfare-style-ebola-blockade-plan-sierra-leone.html#ixzz3I6KTqdv5

Britain’s most senior Army officer, General Sir Nick Carter is considering using Royal Navy ships to patrol its coastal waters.

A defense source told the Daily Mail: ‘From a military perspective Ebola is like a biological warfare attack and should be countered accordingly. There needs to be a clampdown on human movement inside Sierra Leone and possibly to and from the country between now and late 2015 when it is hoped that an antidote will have been developed.’

Sierra Leone President Ernest Bai Koroma has has appointed the Minister of Defense, Major Paolo Conteh as the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the newly established National Ebola Response Center (NERC).

http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/887383.shtml

 

Source.

Operation Hollywood

This interview is from 2004. With everything we are witnessing in the news today, it seems truer than ever, doesn’t it? -LW


How the Pentagon bullies movie producers into showing the U.S. military in the best possible light

—By Jeff Fleischer

To keep the Pentagon happy, some Hollywood producers have been known to turn villains into heroes, remove central characters, change politically sensitive settings, or add military rescues to movies that require none. There are no bad guys in the military. No fraternization between officers and enlisted troops. No drinking or drugs. No struggles against bigotry. The military and the president can’t look bad (though the State Department and Canada can).

“The only thing Hollywood likes more than a good movie is a good deal,” David Robb explains, and that’s why the producers of films like “Top Gun,” “Stripes” and “The Great Santini” have altered their scripts to accommodate Pentagon requests. In exchange, they get inexpensive access to the military locations, vehicles, troops and gear they need to make their movies.

During his years as a journalist for Daily Variety and The Hollywood Reporter, Robb heard about a quid-pro-quo agreement between the Pentagon and Hollywood studios, and decided to investigate. He combed through thousands of Pentagon documents, and interviewed dozens of screenwriters, producers and military officials. The result is his new book, “Operation Hollywood.”

Robb talked with MotherJones.com about deal-making that defines the relationship between Hollywood and the Pentagon.

MotherJones.com: How far back does collaboration between the U.S. military and Hollywood go?

David Robb: The current approval process was established right after World War II. Before that, the Pentagon used to help producers, but it wasn’t very formalized, like it is now. They helped producers going back to at least 1927. The very first movie that won an Oscar, “Wings,” — even that got military assistance.

MJ.com: What steps does a producer take to get assistance from the military? How does the process work?

DR: The first thing you have to do is send in a request for assistance, telling them what you want pretty specifically — ships, tanks, planes, bases, forts, submarines, troops — and when you want this material available. Then you have to send five copies of the script to the Pentagon, and they give it to the affected service branches — Army, Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps, Coast Guard. Then you wait and see if they like your script or not. If they like it, they’ll help you; if they don’t, they won’t. Almost always, they’ll make you make changes to the military depictions. And you have to make the changes that they ask for, or negotiate some kind of compromise, or you don’t get the stuff.

So then you finally get the approval, after you change your script to mollify the military, put some stuff in about how great it is to be in the military. Then when you go to shoot the film, you have to have what I call a “military minder” — but what they call a “technical advisor” — someone from the military on the set to make sure you shoot the film the way you agreed to. Normally in the filmmaking process, script changes are made all the time; if something isn’t working, they look at the rushes, and say, “let’s change this.” Well, if you want to change something that has to do with the military depictions, you’ve got to negotiate with them again. And they can say, “No, you can’t change it, this is the deal you agreed to.” As one of the technical advisors, Maj. David Georgi of the Army, said to me, “If they don’t do what I say, I take my toys and go away.”

After the film is completed, you have to prescreen the film for the Pentagon brass. So before it’s shown to the public, you have to show your movie to the generals and admirals, which I think any American should find objectionable — that their movies are being prescreened by the military.

MJ.com: At that stage, with the film finished, what can the military do if they have a problem?

DR: This happened on the Clint Eastwood movie “Heartbreak Ridge.” He finished the film, showed it to them, and they went through the roof. There was a scene in the script where he shoots an injured and defenseless Cuban soldier. They said, “You have to take that out. It’s a war crime. We don’t want that.” They hate having war crimes in movies. So with “Heartbreak Ridge,” Eastwood shot the film, and the scene ended up in the movie anyway. They said, “We told you to take that out.” He said he thought it was only a suggestion, that he didn’t know he had to. So they withdrew their approval. The film was still released, of course. But at the end of a movie that gets military assistance, there’s always a little tagline that says “thanks to the cooperation of the U.S. Army” or whatever branch. They said, “We’re not going to let you put that on there. We’re withdrawing cooperation.” And they can stop it from being shown in military theaters overseas or on bases in the U.S., which can really hurt the box office of a film. They’ve done this to numerous films. Also, at that time, Clint Eastwood was the chairman of Toys for Tots, the Marine Corps Christmas gift program for poor children. He wanted to screen the movie at a premiere to benefit Toys for Tots, and they said, “We’re not going to let you do that.” They can be very spiteful, they can hurt the box office of a film, and they don’t forget, either. So you do this at your peril. They can’t arrest you, they can’t stop the film. But if you want cooperation again, and you’ve screwed them like that before, you’re not going to get it. People almost never screw the Army on these deals.

MJ.com: What criteria does the Pentagon use in deciding whether to help a film?

DR: The most important one is that the film has to “aid in the retention and recruitment of personnel.” I don’t want to say that’s the whole thing, but it’s the main thing. They also say it has to reasonably depict military operations. And if it’s based on history, they say it has to be historically accurate, which is really a code. They’re much less interested in reality and accuracy than they are in positive images. They often try to change historical facts that are negative. Like with the movie “Thirteen Days,” which was very accurate but very negative toward the military during the Cuban missile crisis, showing that they would have taken us down the path toward World War III. During the negotiations with the producers, Peter Almond and Kevin Costner, the military tried to get them to tone down the bellicose nature of Gen. Maxwell Taylor and Gen. Curtis LeMay — who the record is very clear on, because before Nixon was taping in the White House, Kennedy was taping in the White House, and all the conversations from October 1962 are on tape. When Kennedy rejected LeMay’s insistence that we attack Cuba — when Kennedy said let’s put up a naval blockade, we don’t want to get into war — you can hear Curtis LeMay say, “This is the worst sellout since Munich.” He actually said that, when he didn’t think anybody was listening. Well, the military wanted to change it anyway, saying he was too bellicose and they had to tone it down. To their credit, Kevin Costner and Peter Almond stood up to the military, refused to buckle under, and made their film without military assistance.

MJ.com: Why don’t more producers take that approach?

DR: A lot of the studio heads tell their producers, “We’re not going to make this film unless we get military assistance, because it would be too expensive. So you’d better make sure the script conforms to what they want.” Also, what you don’t see in these documents is the self-censorship that goes with knowing you need their assistance and that they’re going to be your first audience. Writers write stuff to get that military assistance. So there’s no documents saying, “In “Black Hawk Down,” let’s leave out the whole part about the soldiers being dragged through the streets of Mogadishu.” Jerry Bruckheimer knows that if they have that in there, the military’s just going to tell them to take it out or they won’t help them. I asked Ridley Scott, the director, if “Black Hawk Down” could have been made without military assistance. He said, “Yeah. We just would have had to call it ‘Huey Down’.” So there’s this self-censorship. When you know the government is looking over your shoulder while you’re typing, that’s a very bad situation.

MJ.com: Aside from showing war crimes, what are some of the other things the military balks at?

DR: They never — at least that I’ve seen — help movies with aliens. Usually in those movies, the military is shown to be ineffective in combating the aliens, and it’s always some tricky, enterprising person who figures out how to defeat them. Like in “Mars Attacks!,” a grandma playing Slim Whitman over her radio blows the aliens’ heads up. Well, the military didn’t want to help them. They don’t want to help any movie that shows them being ineffective, even in combating aliens. They have no sense of humor! They wouldn’t help “Independence Day.” The military could not get over the fact that one of the key plot points was that the U.S. was secretly working on a spaceship captured at Area 51, so the film ended up not getting assistance.

Another thing, they don’t like drinking or drugs in the military. They’ll make you change that. Like in “Stripes,” they made them take out all drug references, and the original script had lots of drug references. They don’t want to see any pot smoking, even in Vietnam. The former Navy Secretary James Webb, after he left that post, he became a book writer. He’d been a Marine in Vietnam, and one of his books was semi-autobiographical, with many of the things he saw and knew for a fact happened in Vietnam: fragging of officers, smoking pot, burning Vietnamese villages. He had a screenplay and wanted to turn it into a movie. They said, “No, you have to change all this stuff,” and he wouldn’t do it. So that’s a film that never got made. Many films have never been made because they couldn’t get assistance.

MJ.com: In the book, you give examples of how the Pentagon won’t allow military characters to be depicted as bad guys.

DR: Right. For example, there was an HBO movie “The Tuskegee Airmen,” where the military made them replace the villain. This was a movie about the first black airmen during World War II, where the bad guy was a general at the base where these guys were training, and the good guy was a white congressman. Well, the army said they didn’t like that, so they ended up changing it. I have a letter where the producers wrote to the military, to Phil Strub, who’s the head of the Pentagon’s film office. The producers wrote, “The following changes are in the works and will soon be fully executed by the writer. It is our intention to reverse the characterization of General Stevenson and Senator Powell, making the senator the source of bigotry. General Stevenson will be revealed as someone who is loyal to the efforts of the Tuskegee Airmen.” Now when people saw that film, they had no idea that the good guy and the bad guy had been reversed, just so the military could meet its recruiting goals.

MJ.com: You also talk about the military targeting children by encouraging pro-military storylines in shows like “The Mickey Mouse Club” and “Lassie.”

DR: In those cases, they recognized that children are the future recruits. With the “Mickey Mouse Club,” it’s kind of a long story, but they used to show these little documentary films called “Mouse Reels.” For example, they took these kids out on the U.S.S. Nautilus, which was the first nuclear submarine. And there’s a Pentagon document that says, “This is an excellent opportunity to introduce a whole new generation to the nuclear Navy.” It was all military propaganda to show how “child-friendly” nuclear submarines are – there’s hardly any radiation, the food is great, they even have a jukebox that plays the “Mickey Mouse Club March” in the cafeteria.

As far as reaching children, I think one of the best examples — and they’re very candid in these documents, because I don’t think they ever expected anybody to be looking at this stuff — there was this movie “The Right Stuff” about the early days of the space program. The original script was filled with vulgarity and cussing, and the military sent the producers a letter. It reads, “The obscene language used seems to guarantee an ‘R’ rating. If distributed as an ‘R’, it cuts down on the teenage audience, which is a prime one to the military services when our recruiting bills are considered.” Of course, an ‘R’ rating means children under 17 have to be accompanied by a parent, so a lot of 16- and 17-year-olds couldn’t see this picture. And the Air Force wanted young people to see this so they’d get a good, positive image of the military and join up. So they changed it.

MJ.com: Among the films you looked at, which went through the most radical change from the script to the final, military-assisted movie?

DR: There was a movie called “Air Strike” by a guy named Cy Roth. Now, Ed Wood is often credited as being the worst director in Hollywood history, but Cy Roth would really give him a run for his money. Roth decided around 1953 that he’d made a Western, he’d made a space movie, now he wanted to make a war movie. This movie was set on a World War II aircraft carrier, and the lead characters were a young Jewish flyer and a young black flyer who are constantly being subjected to anti-Semitism and racism on the ship. The military said, “No, we don’t want to show any kind of racism or anti-Semitism in this picture, you’ve got to change that.” They also said, “We don’t want a World War II-era picture, we want a movie set in the modern jet age.” And Roth went nuts. He called his congressman, he wrote a letter to President Eisenhower — and the day after the White House got his letter of complaint, they sicced the FBI on him to see whether he was a Communist or not. Well, he finally caved in; he made the picture the way they wanted. So it was no blacks, no Jews, no propellers. If you look at this film, it’s so bad, it looks like a home movie shot on an aircraft carrier. So this film was completely changed.

MJ.com: You argue that this military screening process violates the First Amendment.

DR: The First Amendment doesn’t just give people the right to free speech; fundamentally, it prevents the government from favoring one form of speech over another. There’s a great 1995 Supreme Court case called Rosenberger v. University of Virginia that says, “Discrimination against speech because of its message is presumed to be unconstitutional. It is axiomatic that the government may not regulate speech based on the substantive content of the message it conveys. In the realm of private speech or expression, government regulation may not favor one speaker over another.” And yet that’s what they’re doing every day. Not just 50 years ago on “Air Strike,” but right now. This is a holdover from the Cold War, and it should be abolished. Or at least Congress, which has oversight over the Pentagon, should really look into what’s going on.

Congress has only looked into it twice, when Robert Aldrich made a stink about not getting assistance for the movie “Attack,” and then again in the 1960s when it turned out the government had footed the entire bill for all the military stuff on John Wayne’s “The Green Berets.” In these two investigations, the Pentagon basically said it’s not their intention to influence the content of movies. And Congress just accepted that. If they looked at these documents, they would see that clearly the intent is to influence the movies.

Major Georgi, who had been the military minder on many movies, said that one of the targets of this program is Congress; that Congress goes to movies, and that when they see positive images of the military, that makes it easier for them to vote for that $500 billion military appropriation. They also target voters, the people who are really footing the bill. Really, if you talk to soldiers and sailors and Marines, many of them will tell you they joined the military because of some movie that they saw. The former head of the Marine Corps film office, Matt Morgan, he told me he joined the military after seeing “Top Gun.” After “Top Gun” came out, there was a huge spike in recruitment for the Navy flying program. They know that it works. People are going off to war and getting killed, in part because of some movie that they saw that was adjusted by the military.

MJ.com: What would it realistically take to change this system?

DR: I think that if just 50 people wrote their congressman and asked, “what’s going on here?,” I think it wouldn’t take much. It’s not going to happen otherwise. The Writer’s Guild, whose stated mission is to protect the creative and economic rights of its members, has never made a single protest that its members’ scripts are being manipulated and changed by the military. Congress has done nothing. Hollywood likes the way it is, and the military likes the way it is; they don’t want to change it. The only people who have a real interest in this are the American people. They’re being saturated with military propaganda in their mainstream movies and TV shows, and they don’t even know. But I think there’s a very good argument that can be made that over the past 50 years, this chronic sanitization of the military and what war is has affected the American character; that we’re now a more warlike people than we were 50 years ago. Clearly, there are also other reasons, but I think when the world’s most powerful medium colludes with the world’s most powerful military to put propaganda in mainstream films and television shows, that has to have an effect on the American psyche.

Source.

EbolaGate is actually a Bioweapons False Flag attack strategy, with many sophisticated alternative scenarios

It seems that the National Institute of Health (NIH) is talking about national vaccinations to defend against Ebola. Don’t fall for it. This interview provides excellent information about the Ebola, history of the Spanish Flu (1918), Vitamin C, electron flow in the body, raw milk, and fermented foods. -LW

VANCOUVER, BC –  EbolaGate is actually a Bioweapons False Flag attack strategy, with many sophisticated alternative scenarios, some of which may or may not materialize as in all false flags. The basic premise is to start an Ebola “outbreak” with a bioweapons attack of the Ebola virus in West African countries where local immune systems and health profiles are compromised, there are unsanitary conditions, little public health care, and martial law quarantines for mass infection can easily be imposed (as when towns of 50,000 persons are now being quarantined rather than the infected persons in the towns). Instead of being treated with known Vitamin C and immune system treatments, local populations are given ineffective treatments, or worse, treatments that are themselves bioweapons. The scenario here, led by WHO, is to covertly maximize infection rates and vector propagation, shred local health care and public order (nurses are now on strike in one country). This scenario is aimed at (1) creating a base for an African Bioweapons genocide, long sought because of the mineral, oil and gas wealth of Africa [Think of the US Rangers infecting of South Africa with the AIDS virus embedded in the small pox vaccine in the mid 1990s] (2) Providing the jumping-off point for mutation of the EbolaGate viruses and their traveling via air travel, sea travel, land, to Europe, India, Asia, and North and South America. In North America there awaits a sophisticated Ebola Gate False Flag machine led by WHO-CDC [Nazi-CIA] and Martial law regulations signed by George Bush I & II, Clinton, and Obama that can mandate FEMA incarceration and mass vaccinations with EbolaGate vaccines that maim or kill as part of the depopulation plan.

To see the estimated death toll, under current infection rates of Ebola gate by June 2016 of Infected persons: 4,707,573,324 [4.7 Billion] Dead persons: 2,877,739,573 [2.8 billion] please go to:

Regularly Updated! Deadly Ebola Virus Outbreak – EbolaGate

http://exopolitics.blogs.com/ebolagate/2014/09/regularly-updated-deadly-ebola-virus-outbreak-.html

References:

Alfred Webre: Plan A is Martial Law; Plan B is Ebola. Awareness and Critical Mass can deconstruct planned extermination

 

Source.

The Manipulation of Human Anxiety from Michael Tsarion [video]

Thanks to Extraterrestrials.ning.com for sharing.

Here’s a short video that says a lot. The truth rings through loud and clear. 

There are no comments under this video yet at YouTube so if you see the value, you might share your thoughts and perhaps pre-empt the trolls.  ~ BP

 

Most Astonishing Health Disaster of the 20th Century [video]

This came along at the perfect time in followup to my article about the drugs the US government has pushed on its people.

It’s timeless—from 2007. Thank you Dr. Mercola.

Don’t say, “The government would never do that” until you watch this video. They would, they did, and they’re still ramping it up with more toxic vaccines and lethal substances in the research stages and convincing advertising to get Americans in the operating room.

Swallow at your own risk, because once you get sucked into the medical system, you may never get out without a toe tag.

If you have a health condition, a holistic or naturopathic practitioner can often help you—with no lethal side-effects.  ~ BP

 

For over 100 years conventional medicine has seized control of the US health care system and as a result we have over 800,000 people who are killed by interacting with this system.  It is likely that over 50 million Americans have died prematurely from this abuse.

Unfortunately, most of the people in the US are simply brainwashed from the reality presented in this video. EVERY year they are exposed to over 50 billion dollars of advertising from the drug and food industry that manipulates reality to paint a scenario where it makes perfect logical sense to choose drugs and surgery for chronic degenerative  diseases.

Unfortunately the drug and food companies did not count on the Internet which allows web sites like this one to tell the “other” side of the story.

So please pass this video along to your friends and if you haven‘t yet picked up a copy of Take Control of Your Health, please do as it will provide the solid foundation you need to be prepared and apply the foundational principles to avoid unnecessary drugs and surgery.

Source

You may also want to read this article about the dangers of pre-surgery medication that has killed 800,000 Americans.

 

America, This is Your Government and Their Best Laid Plans for You

In an article today by Jon Rappoport, he enlightens us as to the plans of the CIA back in 1955 to seek the development of drugs for every use imaginable to control the people and cause the ultimate decline of the human population.

Jon is a prolific writer, tireless researcher and as a true investigative journalist has done more than his share to awaken us to the reality of life in our world today. I highly recommend you visit his website and read more.

This is an excerpt from his article.

  • “The CIA wanted to find chemicals that “would produce the signs and symptoms of recognized diseases in a reversible way.” This suggests many possibilities—among them the use of drugs to fabricate diseases and thereby give the false impression of germ-caused epidemics.
  • The CIA wanted to find drugs that would “produce amnesia.” Ideal for discrediting whistleblowers, dissidents, certain political candidates, and other investigators. (Scopolamine, for example.)
  • The CIA wanted to discover drugs which would produce “paralysis of the legs, acute anemia, etc.” A way to make people decline in health as if from diseases.
  • The CIA wanted to develop drugs that would “alter personality structure” and thus induce a person’s dependence on another person. How about dependence in general? For instance, dependence on institutions, governments?
  • The CIA wanted to discover chemicals that would “lower the ambition and general working efficiency of men.” Sounds like a general description of the devolution of society.”

That last bit also sounds like the result of fluoridated water, which is people who behave more like bovines with no ambition and simply go where they’re guided, whether prodded with a stick or led by a golden ring through the nose.

They used fluoride in the Nazi concentration camps to keep prisoners docile. It’s no small wonder America is the most comatose nation on the planet.

Check out this video from Australia wherein fluoride has been exposed for what it is.  Is this a breakthrough or what?!  If you are unaware of the dangers of fluoride, please be sure to watch this video—only 6 minutes long. It may speak of Australia, but the same thing is going on across North America.

Your government acts in its own interests; not yours. The goal is to control the population; to deceive them so they don’t rise up and exercise their rights; to discourage them from thinking for themselves and to have them believing and spewing the lies they tell.

 

Illuminati Defector, ‘Svali’, Details Pervasive Conspiracy

This is a very old article, as you can see, but full of information about the Illuminati/New World Order from a defector, a mind control trainer, who goes by the name of ‘Svali’.

Some say we don’t now know if Svali is dead or alive today, but she did Humanity a tremendous service by sharing this intel. 

Svali

Link to page “Svali Speaks” for more information.

Hopefully people who still think the Illuminati and New World Order are a bunch of paranoid bunk, will realize the truth. It IS difficult to believe, but there is ample data to support this if people will just be brave enough to seek it out. Understandably, ignorance is bliss, but the eyes must be opened at some point.

One of my introductory posts on this blog included an audio file from an interview Kerry Cassidy at Project Camelot did with Svali. I found it fascinating.  ~ BP

Prince William gives familiar Satanic signal

Illuminati Defector Details Pervasive Conspiracy

October 14, 2002

By Henry Makow Ph.D.

(Listen to interview with “Mary Anne” here.)  Mary Anne is not Svali. Merely confirms Svali.

If you detect the devil’s hand in current events, you may be closer to the truth than you think.

A woman who was raised in the Illuminati cult describes a powerful secret organization comprising one per cent of the U.S. population that has infiltrated all social institutions and is covertly preparing a military takeover. Her revelations cast the “war on terror” and “homeland security” in their true light.

“Svali” is the pseudonym of the woman, age 45, who was a mind “programmer” for the cult until 1996. She was the sixth head trainer in the San Diego branch and had 30 trainers reporting to her. She has risked her life to warn humanity of the Illuminati’s covert power and agenda.

She describes a sadistic Satanic cult led by the richest and most powerful people in the world. It is largely homosexual and pedophile, practises animal sacrifice and ritual murder. It works “hand in glove” with the CIA and Freemasonry. It is Aryan supremacist (German is spoken at the top) but welcomes Jewish apostates. It controls the world traffic in drugs, guns, pornography and prostitution. It may be the hand behind political assassination, and “terrorism,” including Sept. 11, the Maryland sniper and the Bali bomb blast.

It has infiltrated government on a local, state and national level; education and financial institutions; religion and the media. Based in Europe, it plans a “world order” that will make its earlier attempts, Nazism and Communism, look like picnics. One other detail: these people are not happy.

Svali’s courageous testimony explains why our children are no longer taught civic values, why they are being habituated to homosexuality and violence, and why our “culture” is descending into nihilism and sexual depravity. It raises the possibility that George W. Bush and his Administration are Illuminists and much of the world “elite” is engaged in a mind-boggling criminal conspiracy.

In March 2000, Svali began writing a monthly column for survivors of Illuminati ritual abuse at Suite101.com. In December 2000, H.J. Springer, the editor of CentrExNews,com contacted Svali and conducted an extended 18-part interview with her by email, which is reproduced on line and is copyrighted.

“I am convinced she is the real McCoy,” Springer wrote to me. “I have personally relayed numerous email messages to her from other members — ritually abused, brainwashed, raped, sexually abused people & you name it — some of them confirming to me her story. So I have absolutely no doubt that Svali has been part of the Illuminati since childhood.”

I also trust Svali’s testimony because it confirms my intuition and intensive research. Everything fits: from the dead hand that seems to suppress humanity to why Clinton gave secret technology to the Chinese, to persistent reports of concentration camps in the US. It explains why people I know behave in a conspiratorial way. I thank Svali for giving me a frightening but incredible key to understanding the world.

A friend urged me to beware of a hoax and offered to help confirm Svali’s personal story. I accepted. I invite you to read her entire testimony and make up your own mind. Read “Part One” to “Part 18” first, starting at the middle of the list and working up.

With their permission, here are some highlights of Svali’s correspondence with CentrExnews.com’s H.J. Springer. I have also included material from her article “Are the Illuminati Taking Over the World?”

Pervasive Presence

Svali: “The Illuminati are present in every major metropolitan centre in the United States. The Illuminati believe in controlling an area through its: banks and financial institutions (guess how many sit on banking boards? You’d be surprised) Local government: guess how many get elected to local city councils? Law: children are encouraged to go to law school and medical school. Media: others are encouraged to go to journalism school, and members help fund local papers.

Beliefs

Svali: “The Illuminati is a group that practices a form of faith known as “enlightenment”. It is Luciferian, and they teach their followers that their roots go back to the ancient mystery religions of Babylon, Egypt, and Celtic druidism. They have taken what they consider the “best” of each, the foundational practices, and joined them together into a strongly occult discipline. Many groups at the local level worship ancient deities such as “El”, “Baal”, and “Ashtarte”, as well as “Isis and Osiris” and “Set”…. I do know that these people teach and practice evil.”

Weishaupt

Svali: “Weishaupt did not create the Illuminati, they chose him as a figurehead and told him what to write about. The financiers, dating back to the bankers during the times of the Templar Knights who financed the early kings in Europe, created the Illuminati. Weishaupt was their “go fer”, who did their bidding.”

Military Takeover

Svali: “Briefly, each region of the United States has “nerve centres” or power bases for regional activity. The United States has been divided up into seven major geographical regions. Each region has localities within it that contain military compounds and bases that are hidden in remote, isolated areas or on large private estates.

These bases are used intermittently to teach and train generational Illuminati in military techniques, hand- to- hand combat, crowd control, use of arms, and all aspects of military warfare. Why? Because the Illuminists believe that our government, as we know it, as well as the governments of most nations around the world, are destined to collapse. These will be planned collapses, and they will occur in the following ways:

The Illuminati has planned first for a financial collapse that will make the great depression look like a picnic. This will occur through the manoeuvring of the great banks and financial institutions of the world, through stock manipulation, and interest rate changes. Most people will be indebted to the federal government through bank and credit card debt, etc. The governments will recall all debts immediately, but most people will be unable to pay and will be bankrupted. This will cause generalized financial panic, which will occur simultaneously worldwide, as the Illuminists firmly believe in controlling people through finances.

Doesn’t sound pleasant, does it? I don’t know the exact time frame for all of this, and wouldn’t want to even guess. The good news is that if a person is debt-free, owes nothing to the government or credit debt, and can live self sufficiently, they may do better than others. I would invest in gold, not stocks, if I had the income. Gold will once again be the world standard, and dollars will be pretty useless (remember after the Civil War? Our money will be worth about what confederate money was after the collapse).

Next there will be a military takeover, region by region, as the government declares a state of emergency and martial law. People will have panicked, there will be an anarchical state in most localities, and the government will justify its move as being necessary to control panicked citizens. The cult trained military leaders and people under their direction will use arms as well as crowd control techniques to implement this new state of affairs. …Military bases will be set up, in each locality (actually, they are already here, but are covert). In the next few years, they will go above ground and be revealed. Each locality will have regional bases and leaders to which they are accountable. The hierarchy will closely reflect the current covert hierarchy.

About five years ago, when I left the Illuminati, approximately 1% of the US population was either part of the Illuminati, sympathetic to it, or a victim of Mind Control (and therefore considered useable). While this may not sound like many, imagine 1% of the population highly trained in the use of armaments, crowd control, psychological and behavioral techniques, armed with weapons and linked to paramilitary groups.”

Leadership

Svali: “The national council [consists of] influential bankers with OLD money such as: The Rockefellers, the Mellon family, the Carnegie family, the Rothschild family etc. I know I shouldn’t name names, but I will.

The “Supreme World Council” is already set up as a prototype of the one that will rule when the NWO comes into being. It meets on a regular basis to discuss finances, direction, policy, etc. and to problem-solve difficulties that come up. Once again, these leaders are heads in the financial world, OLD banking money. The Rothschild family in England, and in France, have ruling seats. A descendant of the Hapsburg dynasty has a generational seat. A descendant of the ruling families of England and France have a generational seat. The Rockefeller family in the US holds a seat.

This is one reason that the Illuminati have been pretty “untouchable” over the years. The ruling members are very, very, very wealthy and powerful. I hope this information is helpful. How do I know this? I was on a local leadership council (a head trainer), but I talked to those on regional. Also, every Illuminati child is taught who their “leaders” are, and told to take an oath of allegiance to them and the “New Order to come”.”

Royalty

Svali: “The Illuminati leadership state that they are descended from royal bloodlines, as well as unbroken occult heritage.

See, there were two definitions of “royalty” used. Open royalty that is currently seen now, and “hidden royalty” of royal lineage and extreme occult power. Sometimes the two were concurrent, such as with the Prince of Wales.

I never thought of which country/line held the most power, since I was just a peon busily doing my job. But my understanding was: The Hanoverian / Hapsburg descendants rule in Germany over the Bruderheist. They are considered one of the strongest lines for occult as well. The British line is just under them, with the royal family. Definitely, they rule the UK branch under the Rothschilds in the occult realm, even though parliament rules the country openly.

In France, again, descendants of the royal families are also in power in the occult realm, but the French Rothschilds hold the reigns over all of them.”

Rank of the US

Svali: “The U.S. is considered lower, and younger, than the European branches. …Germany, France, and the UK form a triumvirate that rules in the European cult. The USSR is considered important, and has the strongest military groups. The USSR has been promised fourth position in the New World Order, BEFORE the role the U.S. would have, because the USSR has been more helpful and cooperative over the years with furthering the agenda.

The descendants of the former ruling families there are also involved in the occult leadership, along with the newer ones. There is no Marxism in the cult. China will be ranked after the USSR, then the U.S. But a lot of the current U.S. leadership will be in Europe when the change occurs, and many have homes there. They will be “changing nationalities” overnight, as it were. This is the little that I do remember. Wish I had been a better student of this stuff, but I was too busy trying to stay alive when I was in it.

Russia will be the military base and powerhouse of the group, since their military commanders (Illuminist) are considered the best in the world, and very, very disciplined. China, because of its roots in oriental occultism, and its large population, will also be considered a higher power than the US. But again, the real power will reside in Europe, according to what I was taught when part of the group.

The United Nations

Svali: “The UN was created early in this century in order to help overcome one of the biggest barriers to a one-world government …That barrier is the one of nationalism, or pride in one’s country. This is why it was NOT a popular concept when first introduced, it took years of country bashing in the media and the destruction of any sense of national pride by a (not so subtle) media campaign over the years.

The UN is a preparation, but it is not the real power in the world, and will be relatively unimportant when the NWO comes into being. The real councils will then step forward. But as a means of getting the general public to accept the idea of a “global community” and the “one world community” the UN is a stepping stone in their working towards the NWO.”

Read the rest of this lengthy article…