The ISIS Conspiracy – Beard World Order #5

These gentlemen examine what has become the annual unveiling of America’s new enemy. -LW


Guillermo Jimenez, James Corbett, and Peter B. Collins celebrate the annual unveiling of America’s new enemy. This year, the distinction goes to the evildoers in the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. Or is it the Khorasan group? What happened to Al-Qaeda? Ebola? Who knows…

(Ret.) Lt. General Thomas McInerney and (Ret.) Major General Paul Vallely Call for DEFCON 1

The main debate here is why President Obama doesn’t feel the need to “Always be Prepared,” unless he is working against America. Areas of concern include Wares, Texas, next week (September 11th, 2014). There is much concern expressed about why Americans are not OUTRAGED that Obama has pledged American support of those deemed as being responsible for 9/11.
Topics include:

  1. Impending Constitutional Crisis
  2. Obama’s Treason
  3. Obama’s support of Jihaddists
  4. PsyOps
  5. Complicity of the media
  6. Naievity of the American People


(Ret.) Lt. General Thomas McInerney & (Ret.) Major General Paul Vallely
Retired U.S. Air Force Lt. General Thomas McInerney tells Rick why America must go to DEFCON 1 immediately. Retired U.S. Army General Paul Vallely tells Rick that a constitutional crisis is quickly approaching which may require the U.S. military to take action domestically to save the Republic.



Defector Ben Swann, former Fox Network Journalist, Explains Corporate Media Agenda

I thought this young lady did a dynamite job of sharing what she learned from Ben Swann about how our media whores corrupt the truth or simply keep reality from us altogether.  Swann worked for the news department of a Fox network affiliate.

I learned a few things myself and appreciate Ben Swann’s dedication to bringing us Truth in Media, his web site.  He is certainly a man of principle and understands what an investigative journalist is.  ~ BP

Media Lies vs. Liberty Truth, One on One with Ben Swann

“Those who hate the truth, hear only hate when the truth is spoken.”

By Guest Contributor- Rachel Blevins

I recently had the privilege of interviewing Ben Swann for a final paper in one of my classes. While the professor wasn’t too fond of the direction my paper went in, I learned a lot from the interview.

In fact, I probably learned more from the 40 minutes I spent on Skype with Ben Swann, than I did during the entire semester in that class!

If you’ve never heard the name before, Ben Swann spent the first fifteen years of his career working in the world of corporate media as a broadcast anchor in Texas and Ohio. He recently made the move to working in alternative media with the Truth in Media Project, which streams content through popular websites and devices, rather than through local media.

Several of the points Swann made during the interview were ones which really made me think, so I thought it was only right to share them.

We all have ways of gathering news throughout the day, whether it’s watching TV, or getting news updates on our favorite websites. I am willing to bet that most of news we watch, read, and listen to is from the corporate media.

It is so easy to just take whatever the corporate stations like CNN, NBC, and Fox feed us, without asking ourselves if it’s really the whole truth. Then there is alternative media – so, my first question was, what is the difference between the two?

1. Corporate Media vs. Alternative Media

Swann explained that all corporate media in the United States is under the ownership of six companies, which are broken into subsidiaries. Even local news outlets are owned by corporations, and these corporations are constantly looking to shrink costs, while increasing the amount of profit. Those with more experience are constantly being filtered out, as Corporate brings in more young, inexperienced people who are more willing to do whatever they are told.

He went on to say that alternative media differs due to the fact that it is run by independent people, working alone and trying to get the news out. While it doesn’t have the pressure of dealing with corporations, alternative media can be negative, because people in alternative media often feel like they have to do something sensational, in order to get noticed.

2. In terms of corporate media, there is a much greater government influence than the general public thinks there is.

Starting at the local level, Swann gave the example of corporate media constantly hiring young and impressionable news anchors and reporters.

He pointed out that, “For example, Public Information Officers for local Police Stations – who, ninety-percent of the time, are former reporters – have learned how to manipulate inexperienced reporters into practically regurgitating press releases, by threatening to cut them off if they report otherwise.”

“Local governments like local media” said Swann, “Because they have learned how to manipulate local media.”

At the national level, Swann said that state and federal governments also prefer corporate media, because even though there is a Left-Right Paradigm, everybody still wants access. It’s much easier to manipulate Media when they want access to your people, which they do through the Left-Right Paradigm system that has been set up. It’s much more difficult for State and Federal Governments to manipulate Alternative Media in the same way, because people in Alternative Media are just looking for anything they can find.

3. Saying that you’re covering both sides of the story creates a presumption that there are only two sides to the story.

In the United States, there is a common belief that everything political is split up into just two sides. This is what Swann refers to as a “Left-Right Paradigm.”

Swann defined the Left-Right Paradigm as the idea that there are two opposing sides: Republican vs. Democrat, Liberal vs. Conservative; if a person identifies with the right side, everyone on the right is good, and vice versa. He said the U.S. government uses this paradigm to “make you think the two sides are fighting against each other when in reality they’re not.”

Swann called stations like CNN, Fox, and MSNBC tabloid news stations, because they do not challenge the status quo. He explained, “Because our media works in concert with the government to sterilize and sanitize much of the news, we are not given an honest representation of what’s out there.”

Swann went on to say, “50% of the entire American electorate is no longer affiliated with the Republican or Democrat parties. What side is everyone else on? They’re not on a side; they have various points of view and political persuasions, but you would never know it watching CNN or MSNBC or FOX. The reason you wouldn’t know is because they don’t want you to know. They want you to believe there are only two sides: the left and the right.”

4. Government isn’t just trying to exert control on the media, they are trying to change the definition of who qualifies as a Journalist.

Ben Swann at United We Stand CTSY Brad Blog

Swann shared that another way the United States government controls the media is through Media Shield Laws. He defined these laws by saying, “As a Journalist, if I am in a position where I have a source that gives me information, I do not have to reveal that source in a court of law.”

“Using Media Shield Laws, the U.S. government is deciding who gets Journalistic protection and who doesn’t,” said Swann.

“They pretend they’re doing it for the sake of looking out for real Journalists. These Laws don’t cover Bloggers, and for a while they didn’t include student journalists.”

Swann explained that Senator Diane Feinstein of California and Senator Chuck Schumer of New York have been working to redefine who a journalist is, through Media Shield Laws. Feinstein wants a Journalist to be defined as someone who works for a corporation. The problem with this is that it is possible to have Journalists who aren’t getting paid, but who are producing better work in terms of Journalism, than the corporate people who actually are getting paid for it. Feinstein’s plans for Media Shield Laws also overstep boundaries when it comes to Freedom of the Press.

“If you go back to the First Amendment, and your rights to Freedom of the Press, that is not a profession to be discussed.” Swann explained, “Freedom of the Press does not extend exclusively to someone who is paid to be a Journalist.”

5. Journalism is supposed to be blind, just like justice is blind.

Swann pointed out the fact that, “Journalism is not about shilling for the greater good. It does not weigh whether or not the public should know something, or deserves to know something.”

He explained that, “as a Journalist you do have a right to your Ethics, and to deciding if you’re going to release information that might put another person’s life in danger; but that’s not a pre-requisite for Journalism. That’s just your own ethics, and ethics aren’t about doing what your government thinks is the best idea.”

As George Orwell said, “Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed. Everything else if public relations.”

6. Due to the government’s stranglehold, corporate media often gives us the opposite of the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

Swann explained that, “the American government has convinced the media that they have a responsibility to the people of the United States, when in fact, they don’t. In America, we have this mentality that says we have to protect the American people by keeping certain information from them, that we think isn’t good for them.”

The first example Swann gave of this, was during the war the United States waged on Iraq. He said that when the United States government killed half a million Iraqis, the American media did not relay the information to the public, and they didn’t show any images of Iraqis that had been killed by the U.S. The United States government convinced the media that showing the public those pictures would make the United States Army look bad, and would put America in harm’s way.

Swann’s second example of corporate media skewing information for the benefit of the United States government deals with U.S. Drone Strikes. He explained that while pictures showing the aftermath of a U.S. Drone Strike have never been shown on National Corporate Media in the United States, the United States has killed thousands of people in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Somalia, Yemen, and Mali over the past seven years, using Drones. They are continuing to kill dozens of people in each of those countries on a regular basis, through Drone Strikes. Yet, the American people have never been shown pictures of the “Collateral Damage,” as the Department of Defense would call it.

Prior to Ben Swann, not one Network News Anchor or Reporter had questioned President Obama on the constitutionality of a “Kill List” with American citizens on it.

Swann believes that “if the American People knew what our Drone Strike Policy was like, the government wouldn’t be able to carry it out. If the public knew all of the information, they would see that 98% of the time, U.S. Drone Strikes are killing innocent people, and only 2% of the time, do they actually kill the intended targets.”

7. The United States government has yet to shut down social media, like some countries, but they have found a way to manipulate and control it.

Recently, a recorded conversation between four high-ranking officials in Turkey discussing how to create an incident in Syria that would allow them to then send Turkish Troops into Syria to get involved with the Civil War there, was leaked onto YouTube, and then shared on Twitter. Rather than apologizing for, or denying the conversation, the government in Turkey called the person who leaked the conversation a traitor, and then shut down YouTube and Twitter to keep people from sharing the conversation.

After hearing of these events, I had to ask… “Will there ever be a similar social media shutdown in the United States?”

Swann said, “If the United States government felt for any reason that they could or should limit those outlets, they would, but right now they do something different.”

Swann went on to explain that, thanks to Edward Snowden, we are aware of a program that has been in place, not to restrict access to social media, but to manipulate it. People are paid by our government to create disinformation and crazy, radical conspiracy theories, and to spread them on the internet, in order to create so much crazy content out there that people don’t know what’s true and what’s not. He summed it up by saying, “government is using our tax dollars to take credibility away from the people on the Internet whose theories are actually close to the truth.”

It’s not the same as shutting down the social media sites, but it is a different type of tactic.

8. The most important story of 2013: The War in Syria that never happened.

While it may seem like corporate media’s ties with the government makes them omnipotent, and unstoppable, that is not always the case. One exception was what Ben Swann called, “the most important story of 2013.”

“The United States government was determined to go to war, and to start firing missiles into Syria – even though they were already covertly funding Al-Qaeda in Syria,” said Swann. “Politicians didn’t stand up to it, and Media definitely didn’t stand up to it. Not only was Bill O’Reilly calling for War, but so were Rachel Maddow and Anderson Cooper. The highest paid people at each of the networks were supporting war in Syria, even though 89% of the American public was not.”

While there was not one report from CNN, FOX, or MSNBC that admitted that going to war with Syria would hand Syria over to Al-Qaeda, new media was able to get the truth out. Ultimately, the reason the public was not for the war, was because new media created content that was shared through social media, that persuaded the public otherwise.

After spending a semester in a class where I was taught to find some middle ground between stations like CNN and Fox, this interview was an eye-opener. It reminded me that there is a whole world of information out there, that is just waiting to be devoured. It also made me take into consideration where loyalties lie when it comes to media. As Thomas Jefferson once said, “When the people fear the government there is tyranny, when the government fears the people there is liberty.”


Leo Wanta Provides Nat. Security Directive 166 Verifying Al-Qaeda / US Partnership

Just in case you didn’t really believe the US government/CIA created al-Qaeda… You can read the actual agreement/directive and confirmation of the partnership at Veterans Today. Nice one.  ~ BP

Sunday, September 22nd, 2013 | Posted by

Wanta: Top Secret National Security Directive 166

The Document that “Licenses” Al Qaeda as an American Operation

Veterans Today 1 of 3 National Security Decision Directive Numb by Gordon Duff

US Al Qaeda Founders/Controllers Exposed

Former al-Qaeda ringleader Osama bin Laden

Thanks, Susan. One of my few friends who gets it.  ;0)

Gordon Duff is certainly letting the juicy ones out these days.

He’s teamed up with Press TV and they say… Osama bin Laden was hired by the US and working with them as an intelligence asset.

The closing is a real zinger, too.

US Ties to Al Qaeda Official

By Gordon Duff and Press TV

Al-Qaeda was established under the authority of President Reagan on March 27, 1985, with National Security Directive 166. This established a broad cover organization that could engage in arms and financial transactions otherwise prohibited by US law.”

High-level sources inside America’s intelligence community are totally flabbergasted by recent administration policies, particularly regarding Syria. The consensus is that the Obama administration is operating “totally blind” and doesn’t care.

Top policy advisors opposed to the new Russian-Iranian alliance, on advice from Israel, are shifting America’s position in Syria’s now “three-sided” foreign-backed insurgency.

Israeli Ambassador to Washington Michael Oren, acting as de facto White House spokesman, explains why the Obama administration has now abandoned its support of moderate forces for those of al-Qaeda.

From the Jerusalem Post:

“’Tehran-Damascus-Beirut arc is the greatest danger,’ says outgoing Israeli envoy to US Michael Oren.

’Bad guys’ backed by Iran are worse for Israel than ‘bad guys’ who are not supported by the Islamic Republic … the initial message about the Syrian issue was that we always wanted [President] Bashar Assad to go, we always preferred the bad guys who weren’t backed by Iran to the bad guys who were backed by Iran,’ he said.

This was the case, he said, even if the other ‘bad guys’ were affiliated to al-Qaida.”

The fact is al-Qaeda militants are actively wiping out moderate rebel factions fighting the Assad regime, now clearly with Israeli backing. That means another “arc” exists: Tel Aviv, al-Qaeda and the globalist cabal of neocons, Zionists and financial criminals.

Assisting them every step of the way is the controlled corporate media and the governments they have bought and blackmailed.

Wikipedia claims al-Qaeda was founded by Osama bin Laden while in Peshawar, Pakistan during the late 1980s. This is an outrageous fiction.

Al-Qaeda was established under the authority of President Reagan on March 27, 1985, with National Security Directive 166. This established a broad cover organization that could engage in arms and financial transactions otherwise prohibited by US law.

It was never intended as a vehicle for false-flag terrorism. That would come later. It was a cover operation meant to allow clandestine operations that required a high degree of deniability.

Al-Qaeda is an organization totally under the control of the intelligence agencies of the US, Israel, Britain and France. The real foundation of al-Qaeda and its oversight, its very real hierarchy, is outlined below.

A similar organization had been formed to deal with the danger of Soviet expansionism in Europe. It was called “Gladio.” Eventually, Gladio became a very real terror organization, operating in Europe for over a decade.

Chosen to head that what we now call “Al Qaeda” was Osama bin Laden or “Colonel Tim Osman,” as he was known.

Bin Laden worked directly with White House national security advisors and the Central Intelligence Agency. From his headquarters in Islamabad and Peshawar, bin Laden coordinated American activities in Afghanistan and across the Islamic world.

In August 1989, bin Laden met with White House intelligence advisor Lee Wanta and CIA station Chief Jimmie Chee to arrange the repatriation of the last 116 Stinger missiles in inventory in Pakistan.

Details and transcripts of that meeting are available, a meeting held in English.

In early 1990, bin Laden, suffering from advanced kidney disease, was flown to an American facility in the Persian Gulf.

From there, bin Laden flew to Los Angeles, landing in the Ontario airport, met by Albert Hakim, representing President Bush (41), Ollie North (free on appeal bond), Admiral William Dickie, attorney Glenn Peglau and General Jack Singlaub, one of the founders of the CIA.

Hakim was the personal representative of President Bush and in overall charge of the project. “Bud” McFarlane, an Iran-Contra figure pardoned by President Bush in 1992, was also a part of the group.

Bin Laden then left Los Angeles for Washington DC. There he stayed in the Mayflower Hotel. Meetings were held at the Metropolitan Club in Washington. Attorney Glenn Peglau stayed at the Metropolitan.

While there, Peglau’s room was broken into and “items” removed.

At no point is there record, classified or public, that this “working group” was ever dissolved nor is there any record that Osama bin Laden’s status as a security operative working for the US government ever ended.

In 2001, Osama bin Laden’s last public statement denied any involvement in the 9/11 attacks. There are no classified documents tying bin Laden to 9/11 or citing him to be a “rogue CIA operative.”

The CIA’s “bin Laden Unit” and the “hunt for bin Laden” are as fictional as “Zero Dark 30,” the Oscar winning fairy tale outlining the alleged murder of one of America’s most important intelligence assets, a man who died in 2001.

Today, Ambassador Michael Oren, in his last public statement, has admitted Israel’s full and continued relationship with al-Qaeda and the White House working group that helped found that organization so many years ago.

The paragraphs above contain more classified intelligence of a higher level than ever before released.

“False Flag”

With the acceptance of the “false flag” mantra by the powerful Tea Party wing of the opposition party, tapping in on broad public distrust of decades of government lies, the Obama administration has chosen unilateralism, not just as a global policy, but at home as well.

Now that the genie is out of the bottle and “false flag terrorism” is recognized as something other than “conspiracy theory,” the door is open for broad reassessment of a number of nagging issues, particularly 9/11, but much more as well, including the well-orchestrated financial disaster that has destroyed the economic well-being of millions of American families.

Advisors have told Obama he needs something to unite Americans and distract them from an awakening that will destroy all confidence in American leaders, rigged elections, phony terror wars and a scam economy.

Yesterday’s inexplicable incident at the Navy Yard in Washington, 13 dead, no motive, vanished suspects and conflicting accounts, will only add to the loss of credibility.

Military Backlash

They are making America the “laughing stock” of the world, something top military leaders are frightened by. “America is burning down its credibility, humiliating allies.”

This week, while talking with a senior army intelligence officer, I was told the following:

“We reviewed the CIA report they gave Congress and the president. It was pure “amateur hour.”

What else can you expect from a pack of drug dealers?

This is right out of the Bush era, using NSA intercepts to create traffic analysis patterns and simply inventing a hypothesis to fit a policy.

We have long known that “traffic analysis” intelligence is worthless, Israel is the world’s expert at creating phony radio traffic and they are in this up to their eyeballs.”

What Obama’s team is doing has been done before, filtering out any information that doesn’t fit and spinning the rest to support what is clearly America’s “last gasp” in the Middle East.

The reports contained no mention of six rebels indicted in Turkey for buying ten tons of chemicals to make sarin gas and no mention of earlier arrests with sarin-filled canisters.

Whatever Washington is telling the public, a public totally opposed to a war in Syria, it is now dedicated to regime change, the policy Israel announced today.

Intelligence meltdown

It is quite possible that the last well-informed American was former Vice President Dick Cheney. His years in Washington gave him direct access to real information. Cheney knew who the fools and liars were, President Obama and his top advisors certainly don’t.

The problem with Cheney wasn’t that he was stupid, far from that, it was his agenda, a life dedicated to serving totalitarian powers, a life dedicated to chaos and conquest.

It has become increasingly clear that Cheney was president, not Bush. History has shown Bush to be little more than a rich boy on an ego trip, an untreated alcoholic and addict, dangerously impetuous, with no grasp of policy, no intellectual capacity and the attention span of a gnat.

His role as a 21st century Napoleonesque figurehead will be his enduring legacy.

Now, America’s “ship of state” seems headed back in that same direction, all evidence of course correction erased while America plans for a Syrian invasion, building another “coalition of the willing.” Has President Obama chosen to take his own “road to Waterloo?”


Those close to the president have advised him to do everything possible to undermine talks with Russia over Syria. The agenda is clear. Syria is to have a regime change, even at risk of World War.

Obama’s advisors tell him Putin will back down as Russia’s program to rebuild its military into a credible conventional deterrent in the Middle East is a decade from realization.

Obama is being told this is the time for a confrontation with Russia and Syria is his opportunity; otherwise, America’s influence in the region is over. What he is not being told and what his intelligence reports have had carefully excised from them is the regional reality that General Martin Dempsey, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, had been trying to convey for months.

America has been manipulated into taking on a position in Syria that will lead to a full-scale civil war, one that will make the hundred thousand casualties of the last two years seem insignificant in comparison.

The original goal was Balkanization with Turkey seizing Northern Syria, Israel expanding to the suburbs of Damascus and al-Qaeda setting up a jihadist state extending into Iraq as a base for taking down the Baghdad government.

In the process, the Christian population of Syria and Iraq/Kurdistan will be slaughtered.

Lebanon would be isolated and destroyed as well with Israel exacting revenge on Hezbollah for their humiliation in 2000 and 2006.

Sea of Lies

How many in Washington are aware of the real history, the founding of al-Qaeda, of Gladio, the coup of 2000, of 9/11 or the fantasy world of orchestrated false flag terrorism, revolutions “on demand” or drone murder?

Before the end of the Reagan presidency, most real military and intelligence operations had moved outside official channels. In 2001, the rogue cabal that had operated above and beyond any government became the government.

We are now seeing evidence that it is still “alive and well.”


Ho-Hum… Another False Flag

Oh, I DO love a new false flag to set the Internet all a-flutter, don’t you? And Twitter… and Facebook…and all the mass media outlets. It keeps life exciting, doesn’t it?

Oh, I’m sorry, do I sound blasé about the whole thing—including the deaths of innocent people? My apologies. I suppose I’ve become desensitized. Sigh.

The fool-proof formula is decked out in neon lights and impossible to ignore. I’m no investigative journalist, but I’ve obviously been hanging out with the conspiracy theorists too long because the instant I heard about the shooting, I knew.

Who among the media—and I mean the ‘REAL’ journalists—will crack first and expose this “game” for what it is? That’s what I’d like to know.

In the interim, all we have are the non-journalists, bless their hearts. We will enlighten the world. We will share the truth where none else will tread. 

Here’s some more excellent non-journalism and a good history lesson.  ~ BP

The Navy Yard Shootings

From Brasscheck TV:

Same old, same old.

First it’s three shooter, then it was two.

Now it’s just one – and he’s dead.

He had no motive, but the politicians are already using the event to advance pre-set agendas.

Rally around the commander and chief, do what he says, and turn over your guns.


NATO and the terrorist network Gladio What was Operation Gladio?

It was a combination of gansgters and NATO operatives who collaborated together to stage terrorist acts throughout Europe, the Middle East and Latin America.

Sometimes they were designed to appear to originate from right wing groups. Other times from left wing groups.

The point was to destabilize governments that were not 100% compliant with US wishes.

Officially the program ran from 1953 to 1958 – but many researchers believe it operated a lot longer, from 1947 to 1981.

Interestingly, Donald Rumsfeld, whose bloody hands appear everywhere, was for a time the US’s permanent representative to NATO during the Operation Gladio program.

See the video here:

– Brasscheck

P.S. Please share Brasscheck TV e-mails and
videos with friends and colleagues.

That’s how we grow. Thanks.