Chief McDonald’s fries supplier gets USDA nod for ‘cancer-reducing’ GMO-potato

McDonald’s is now resorting to serving GMO french fries under the guise that they fight cancer? How absurd is that? -LW


Comparison of Innate and conventional potatoes 10 hours after being cut (photo: Simplot)

Comparison of Innate and conventional potatoes 10 hours after being cut (photo: Simplot)

Simplot, one of the world’s biggest agribusinesses, has received USDA approval for Innate, a genetically-modified potato that produces fewer carcinogens when fried. Anti-GMO pressure groups are campaigning for the decision to be reversed.

“This approval comes after a decade of scientific development, safety assessments and extensive field tests,” said the Idaho-based Simplot, which annually processes about 3 billion pounds of potatoes.

The potatoes, which are also modified to bruise less easily and to not turn brown for many hours after being cut, underwent successful field trials in eight states – Florida, Indiana, Idaho, Michigan, Nebraska, North Dakota, Washington and Wisconsin – between 2009 and 2011.

Innate reportedly produces up to 75 percent less acrylamide, a substance that is suspected of contributing to cancer, when fried. The medical implications of the alterations have not been tested.

US Department of Agriculture chemical tests showed that all non-targeted substances remained within regular range, and that the plants posed no danger to other crops located in the vicinity. Simplot said that it expects to receive clearance from the Food and Drug Administration that the potato is safe to eat within weeks.

Simplot, which had revenues of $5.8 billion last financial year, reassured that the technology is not as alarming as that used by other companies, which introduce bacteria or genes from other plants. Simplot is simply manipulating genes contained within the potato’s own DNA.

AFP Photo/Goergh Koch

AFP Photo/Goergh Koch

“We are trying to use genes from the potato plant back in the potato plant,” Haven Baker, chief potato scientist for Innate, told the New York Times. “We believe there’s some more comfort in that.”

The company plans to use the potato’s main benefits for a two-pronged assault on the market. The spuds will be sold as a healthier alternative, and will also be supplied pre-cut to supermarkets and restaurants, due to the fact that they remain pristine-looking for longer. In fact, while the purported cancer effect will grab the headlines and curry public opinion, it is the longevity that really gives Innate its market advantage.

“This could be a game-changer for the industry!” boasted Kerwin Bradley, Simplot’s director of commercialization.

But an anti-GMO food groups did not share his enthusiasm.

“We think this is a really premature approval of a technology that is not being adequately regulated,” Doug Gurian-Sherman, a plant pathologist and senior scientist at the Center for Food Safety, told the New York Times.

The organization says that the RNA interference technique used for Innate is untested, and said that one of the substances suppressed by it actually plays an important role in the chemical make-up of the potato, and its ability to fight pests.

The Center for Food Safety says that it plans to appeal the USDA approval.

McDonald’s favorite supplier

Simplot’s role as a GMO potato pioneer is somewhat ironic, considering that it played a decisive role in the discontinuation of the world’s first flirtation with innovative spuds more than a decade ago.

Monsanto sold its NewLeaf genetically-modified potato resistant against the Colorado beetle and PVY virus between 1996 and 2001.

But as it was gaining popularity, activists pressured McDonald’s and other leading fast food chains in the US to turn their back on GMO potatoes. In turn Simplot, which supplies more than half of McDonald’s potatoes in the US and has done so for decades, simply stopped planting NewLeaf potatoes.

As a result, Monsanto stopped selling its range, concentrating on more successful products. More than 90 percent of soybeans and 60 percent of corn in the US are now genetically-modified.

The Food and Water Watch group has hoped to repeat the trick, already sending a petition signed by over 100,000 people, asking McDonald’s to ban all Innate potatoes.

But this time Simplot is unlikely to be fobbed off so easily. The company says that it plans to produce a new-generation Innate potato in the coming years, which will be resistant to late blight – the cause of the Irish Potato Famine – by mixing genes of wild potatoes into cultivated varieties.

The company says it is also seeking approval for Innate in Canada, Japan and Mexico.

Source.

About Light Worker 29501

I am a Canadian Indigo adult, Reiki Master, and Bitcoin enthusiast. My background is in IT and fixing broken hearts. Since 2012, I have been investigating and debunking (where necessary) much of "truther" movement, particularly in the areas of banking and government. These days, I survive mostly on blog donations and non-corporate IT work. If you find value in my work, please consider making a small donation to patrick29501 [at] gmx.com at GoldMoney.com. (https://www.goldmoney.com/r/WIV0xy)

13 thoughts on “Chief McDonald’s fries supplier gets USDA nod for ‘cancer-reducing’ GMO-potato

  1. I was done with McDonalds 7 years ago. Golden arches are the phallus of Osiris. This FF junk food industry started out selling HOT DOGS (phallus), go figure. There’s a lot more, but it’s useless to convey this information to a public that really doesn’t care what it eats long as it’s tasty. Meanwhile people remain pathologically gullible, poorly informed and insouciant.

  2. sharen brewer says:

    We aren’t eating McDonalds French fries anymore.

  3. Old Shep says:

    If they really believed these Franken-Fries had any impact whatsoever on reducing cancer rates then there is no chance in hell they would receive approval from the USDA.

    • Rina Robertson says:

      But what if it could kill people from diabetes, and heart disease, etc. but they don’t tell anyone that? Then they might pass it ’cause that would keep Pharma happy, eh ?

  4. Making the claim fight’s cancer, would that not be classified as a drug..
    just a thought

  5. Well, if this depopulation effort also fails they can always fall back on the Mcmelamine fries research underway in China.

  6. Jimmy says:

    I do not want to consume anything GMO (period). However, if the GMO industry is so insistent in that there is nothing harmful about their products,…. why don’t they create a GMO Only City, where all of the GMO people can live & consume their own “product”. Then after 50 years of testing any single product (on themselves) w/o any additional variations, “we” can then make an assessment as to whether there is any potential value as to consider any of their creations for “regular human” consumption,… But of course, only after careful scrutiny, independent pier reviews, & open source documentation available to all of humanity for their consideration.

  7. Reblogged this on ISSS INTERNATIONAL and commented:
    The perfect example that lobbying is above all and all that is in business nowadays

Comments are closed.