The Destruction of the Coded 20-14 Georgia Guidestone Block

In this video, Mr. Cati decodes the Georgia Guidestone block that was recently reoved and destroyed. During the decoding, he comes up with a date of October 24th, 2014–the day after the solar eclipse. He is confident that this block was not a prank, as we have been told, but that it was removed because their ritual was tainted by being exposed. What do you think? -LW

This video discusses the recent removal and destruction of the recently placed, 20-14 Georgia Guidestone block. The recent public destruction of the coded block, has allowed all 6 sides of the granite block, to be observed and noted.The markings from all 6 sides are as follows: MM, JAM, 8-14-16-20. This is a 2-4 pattern and thus produces a 24. This number should be noted.All numbers and letters engraved on the block have been decoded and are discussed in this new report.

About Light Worker 29501

I am a Canadian Indigo adult, Reiki Master, and Bitcoin enthusiast. My background is in IT and fixing broken hearts. Since 2012, I have been investigating and debunking (where necessary) much of "truther" movement, particularly in the areas of banking and government. These days, I survive mostly on blog donations and non-corporate IT work. If you find value in my work, please consider making a small donation to patrick29501 [at] at (

5 thoughts on “The Destruction of the Coded 20-14 Georgia Guidestone Block

  1. solar bloom says:

    “7” (16) denotes mind control, which would make it a perfectly symmetrical symbolic and conceptual compliment to the “9 – 1 – 1” 🙂 They don’t need to be numerically identical, just reflect (mirror) the intent and expression of each other….

  2. richbuckley7 says:

    The only comment I have on the analysis in MrCati’s methodology is a mistake I feel he makes in his 9-11 numerology. He uses two different methodologies to render 9-11. He labels his methodology as a 2-4 pattern….obviously still outside my understanding. In any event, he does not seem to apply the same 2-steps on both sides of the cube. He adds 2 corners 4+7 to yield 11. This he is drawn to set off as 1/2 the infamous 9-11 event.  But then he uses just 1-corner of the cube (not 2-corners) on the other side which is 9+7 but ignoring the 7 (thus breaking his own apparent cited logic) and rendering just a 9 when it should seem to be 16 if being consistent.  I think it’s a totally forgivable, emotional mistake by MrCati… but I still think he’s on to something and does give us:

     “MM, JAM, 8-14-16-20. This is a 2-4 pattern and thus produces a 24.”

    We should consider these all part of a code key to break the code. Perhaps others can add to MrMati’s excellent video.

    • Rich – Good eye. Hopefully, more people will take note, and offer further insight. -LW

    • Dakini says:

      right… i got that on the 9 & 11 too – the way he got the 9 was different than the 11 and when decoders do that with numbers the whole argument falls apart because it becomes capricious. Otherwise his argument was pretty compelling, like getting to 10-22 & 1024.

Comments are closed.