Second Amendment Test or Horrible Idea? Activist Calls for Armed Protesters to March on Washington, D.C.

I certainly hope “The Event” comes long before these folks decide to implement this. It could get ugly. In fact, I don’t think it could end well.

Below is the Facebook page announcing this initiative.

Adam Kokesh Calls for an Armed March on Washington, D.C.

Activist and talk radio host Adam Kokesh in a Facebook post last week called on his listeners to join him on July 4 to march on Washington, D.C., with loaded guns.

More than 1,500 people have responded to say they plan to attend the event.

Here’s what Kokesh wrote in the original post [emphases added]:

On the morning of July 4, 2013, Independence Day, we will muster at the National Cemetery & at noon we will step off to march across the Memorial Bridge, down Independence Avenue, around the Capitol, the Supreme Court, & the White House, then peacefully return to Virginia across the Memorial Bridge. This is an act of civil disobedience, not a permitted event. We will march with rifles loaded & slung across our backs to put the government on notice that we will not be intimidated & cower in submission to tyranny. We are marching to mark the high water mark of government & to turn the tide. This will be a non-violent event, unless the government chooses to make it violent. Should we meet physical resistance, we will peacefully turn back, having shown that free people are not welcome in Washington, & returning with the resolve that the politicians, bureaucrats, & enforcers of the federal government will not be welcome in the land of the free.

There’s a remote chance that there will be violence as there has been from government before, and I think it should be clear that if anyone involved in this event is approached respectfully by agents of the state, they will submit to arrest without resisting. We are truly saying in the SUBTLEST way possible that we would rather die on our feet than live on our knees.

You are welcome to attend unarmed as a supporter, or armed with a recording device.

We especially invite law enforcement officers to stand with us armed however they feel is appropriate.

He later added this update:

UPDATE 130506 Now that it’s undeniable that this is going to happen, allow me to make clear how. There will be coordination with DC law enforcement prior to the event. I will recommend that they do the best they can to honor their oaths and escort us on our route. Failing to provide that commitment to safety, we will either be informed that we will only be allowed up to a certain point where we would be arrested. If this is the case, we will approach that point as a group and if necessary, I will procede to volunteer myself to determine what their actual course of action with someone crossing the line will be at which point fellow marchers will have the choice of joining me one at a time in a peaceful, orderly manner, or turning back to the National Cemetery.

Sure, responding to alleged government suppression with acts of civil disobedience is usually a noble endeavor, but certain right-of-center commentators say Kokesh’s idea is just plain awful.

“Honestly, it’s difficult to imagine a worse idea, particularly in the midst of a heated debate with gun grabbers in the government,” Jazz Shaw writes for Hot Air.

“If [Kokesh] wanted to promote an act of peacefully breaking the law to make a point, it would certainly be worthy of considering. For example, you could take a large number of people to block the entrance to the main office of the A.T.F and force the police to arrest and remove you,” he added. “But this is something very different.”

Shaw goes on to explain the obvious downsides to protesters with loaded guns charging around a city with strict gun laws:

Showing up with a thousand (or even a few hundred) people openly carrying loaded weapons and marching toward the Capitol is not something that law enforcement is going to play around with, particularly when you announce it in advance.

And they’re not going to allow the march to proceed “peacefully” either. Normally I’d write this off as a bad idea that wouldn’t gain widespread support, but the problem here is that it doesn’t need widespread support. It would really only take a few hundred really upset people to get it rolling. And even if most of them intend it to be peaceful, when the officials show up to arrest them, weapons drawn, you have the potential for disaster…

Also, aside from creating a highly volatile situation with the police, the optics of a hundred or so gun owners breaking guns laws in a major American city will most certainly ​hurt the pro-Second Amendment camp.

There could be no better gift to hand to gun rights opponents than to have a bunch of people get arrested for breaking established (if really bad) gun laws or, worse, getting in a shootout with the cops,” Shaw writes. “This is not the type of representation we need in this debate.”

To many, on both the left and the right, the armed protest sounds backwards. Who is Kokesh trying to win over and why would anyone knowingly create and/or participate in a situation where armed conflict with the police is a possibility?

Perhaps it’s worth taking a closer look at the protest’s organizer. Conservative authoress Michelle Malkin reminds us of Kokesh’s questionable background in political activism:

Adam Kokesh…marched in uniform in mock patrols for the anti-war movement, paraded around holding an upside-down American flag (see Jonn Lilyea for more), was arrested for defacing signs, and traveled to Germany to urge soldiers to abandon their posts and seek aid and comfort with his anti-war minions.

Kokesh, believe it or not, is now running as a Republican candidate for Congress in New Mexico. And, believe it or not, he is getting positive exposure on at least one Fox News show. He has the backing of Ron Paul, the Republican Liberty Caucus, and the 9/12 Project.

The New Mexico Republican Party has its head in the sand. If you have friends and family in New Mexico, make sure they know who the real Adam Kokesh is.

He is an anti-war smear merchant in GOP clothing. Spread the word.

Oh, and then there’s this tweet from Kokesh: “It’s time to abolish the US federal government.”

And there’s this: “When the government comes to take your guns, you can shoot government agents, or submit to slavery.”

So – is this actually about the right to bear arms or is it about “fighting the man”?

Source

Operation Decepticon—North Korea

Credit: MankatoFreepress.com

I think it’s pretty obvious, don’t you, that the Korea thing is a false flag? I mean, it’s ridiculous! Dennis Rodman and Kim Jong Un are buds and play Bball together? Do you have that picture in your mind? LOL. And now Rodman is supposedly planning another trip to hang with Kim again. Like that’s going to make it all better. Give me oxygen!

Here’s what one journalist thinks the Korea distraction is all about. This is a VERY interesting article on many levels. I highly recommend it.

And if you disagree that the whole Korea deception is at least partially to deflect attention from the gun grab, take a look at this pathetic attempt to garner support for gun control… do people really fall for this theater?

To quote from the article below…

It has been claimed by one former top Intel and State department official that there were no dead kids at Sandy Hook, none at all making it a completely pre-engineered virtual mass shooting.

The Korea war scenario is a win-win-win for all parties except the American people.  Here’s the article:

So far the conflict between the USG and North Korea is a virtual false-flag only. A major Psyops designed to deflect attention away from a seriously failing US Administration which is pulling out all the stops to pass gun-control laws which are designed to eventually lead to complete confiscation.

Operation Decepticon—North Korea

Preston James Veterans Today

So far the conflict between the USG and North Korean is a virtual false-flag only. A major Psyops designed to deflect attention away from a seriously failing US Administration which is pulling out all the stops to pass gun-control laws which are designed to eventually lead to complete confiscation.

Operation Decepticon—North Korea

This current conflict with North Korea has been engineered and portrayed as a real state of conflict when it is virtual only. In practical terms, North Korea and America are now only involved in a state of virtual war which is unlikely to be followed with an actual real shooting war.

Virtual war is an imaginary war fought only in the major mass media, and the enemy is the news consumer or the public which is psychologically managed. Virtual war  is a newer type of warfare which is a major Psychological operation, (aka a Psyop), that is, an act of Mindwar against the people.

As the infamous Iron Mountain study group which was comprised of the some of the top secular scientists inside America concluded, a state of war is needed by societies to solidify them, strengthen them and consolidate central governmental power necessary for the survival of the existing power structure.

It was their conclusion that the state’s exercise of its war-making power provided the glue which held a nation together and maintained their power over that society.

Operation Decepticon—North Korea

A Decepticon is a two part operation where the first part, a major international deception is communicated in the mass media after being engineered by various USG officials and military working with counterparts in other nations.

The second part of the operation is comprised of using that major deception to manufacture false confidence (the Con) of the people in their government where none is indicated or deserved.

The current USG conflict with North Korea is a backchannel, virtual war being fought in the major mass media for the purpose of distracting the American public and creating the illusion that the current administration has prevented WW3, thus strengthening its viability.

There is something for everyone when a Decepticon is successfully deployed.  The USG gets what it wants, a bolstered image on successful avoidance of WW3 and an appearance of major nuclear war power that established predominance in the world.

The Korean people get bamboozled and feel that they really showed the South Koreans and the Americans and Japanese they can’t be pushed around.  And maybe a deal has already been negotiated for backchannel food or fuel shipments to North Korea as part of the pre-arranged virtual war?

The economy at home in America is failing, the common man has about had it with the current administration and a long line of presidents that have NOT served the people.

Certainly the cover stories that have been spun would shock the tooth fairy!  Like the tall tale that Chinese leaders are getting angry with the naughty little Kim Jong Un, or that North Korea has viable nukes and working ICBMs that can go all the way to Hawaii and Austin Texas.

If folks believe these stories I have a nice bridge in Brooklyn you can buy at a reasonable price.

The American People are the main target of this virtual false-flag attack on their psyche, belief system and group mind.

Arranged photo op of nuclear missile targets

The target of this major backchannel psyop is the American people which need to be managed and re-directed in manner only possible by creation of a state of actual or virtual warfare.

The same effects desired can be produced in the populace by use of virtual war as with any shooting war or any major act of false flag terror such as Murrah, the 911 attack, or Aurora, Sikh Temple or Sandy Hook if conducted effectively.

Experts have predicted that future conflicts will be mostly economic, monetary and cyber warfare, with no actual shooting wars required. This is true, however there is another option which is becoming very prominent and that is virtual war fought in the major mass media which if done properly can obtain the desired results without a real shooting war.

If necessary however, a partial or full scale shooting war can be resorted to as a default option according to various preset parameters if the Decepticon fails.  If desired it can usually be successfully managed to be a perpetual low intensity conflict without setting off WW3 as long as backchannel deals include all the major players at the top of each major nation states.

Or conceivably it could be a pre-negotiated major nuclear exchange using state of the art nukes with rapidly dissipating fallout, either neutron antipersonnel devices or high blast low radiation devices.

Everybody must get something to keep them satisfied with the pre-engineered war that is deployed and managed except those who do the actual fighting or who are wounded, are killed and asset stripped by it.

Any Virtual war can now be effectively conducted and managed through the controlled major media with pre-approved news releases to attain the current desired goals of a failing administration.

When these Virtual Wars are conducted effectively the leaders of all sides get something and major loss of life can be avoided. Some insiders have said that basically the USG cannot afford any more prolonged foreign wars.

It appears that Virtual Wars are the way of the future as the NWO Globalist secret Government is slowly solidified and shoved into place.  Virtual wars are what happen when a NWO Globalist secret Government already exists via backchannel political and military deals.

Backchannels probably constitute a secret world government not yet complete solidified, but one which functions a NWO Globalist world Government.

Most know that when G7 was set up all parties shared the use of American black operatives.  It has also been suspected that the same is true of the G20 nations where there are secret but common intel functions.

And some insiders believe that although this kind of information is highly compartmented as special access only based on strict need to know, secret backchannels already exist between almost all major governments including all NATO countries, Russia, China, north Korea, Iran, ect., almost all of them, despite the images publicly portrayed in the major mass media which is for consumption by the masses and for the political manipulation of the people.

Apparently the orders to start a major legislative process to grab the guns has come down from the top of the pyramid of control at the Old Black Nobility (OBN) which is located in Europe and maintains a very low non-public profile.

We are still months away from a Sandy Hook report, despite their being no jury pool to taint with an earlier release of information.

Obviously the current Administration has been ordered by those higher ups that control it to begin a process similar to that which was previously successfully deployed in Canada and Australia to get the guns.

The American plan is a plan designed to start with staged mass shooting by USG mindkontrol (psyops) experts such as which occurred at Aurora, Sikh temple and Sandy Hook.

It has been claimed by one former top Intel and State department official that there were no dead kids at Sandy Hook, none at all making it a completely pre-engineered virtual mass shooting.

The next stage of the SSG’s American plan to grab guns is to submit highly excessive DHS and USG ammo orders to choke off supply, and grotesque efforts to pass federal and state gun registration laws which are clearly unConstitutional but required by the REAL rulers of America, folks inside the SSG which take their orders from their superiors leading all the way back to the top Kingpins in the Old Black Nobility of Europe, the secret control center for the New Roman Empire.

The next stage of the SSG’s plan to grab guns is to set up a National Registry which can be later used as a fulcrum to get the guns.

And the next stage after that is to use medical doctors and nurses and insurance companies as snitches to conjure up phony reasons to deny folks their second Amendment Constitutional Rights. You can be quite certain that maximum pressure to pass certain desired gun laws is now being applied to federal and State lawmakers and Governors.

Maximum pressure is now being applied to USG and State officials, Governors and Legislators to get desired gun laws changed despite the fact they are completely unConstitutional. And some fear that the fix is in at the highest court of the land with one closeted individual and two “twisted sisters” which can be quite easily “managed”.

Despite all the expert opinions of Psyop specialists, it now looks like the Top Kingpins and their Cutouts have underestimated the American Spirit which is now awakened and growing in Strength every day.

Has the good folks calvary really been unleashed?

Despite all the algorithmic calculations and hardheaded resolve at the OBN who are the top Kingpins and their Cutouts at the SSG, it now appears that America has been a sleeping giant that is now awakened over the attempted gun-grabbing, and the massive American Spirit is growing in stature and power everyday.

The top Kingpins and their Cutouts have seriously overestimated their power to deceive and mindkontrol Americans and now will find out the hard way that they have crossed a line in the sand that will eventually assure their demise.

When the Top Kingpins and their Cutouts run into a brick wall and are stopped cold, they often resort to instituting a major false flag attack or an actual shooting war. Sometimes the false flag attacks are real with dead bodies like at Murrah or the 911 attack.  But sometime they are virtual only like at Sandy Hook where top intel experts have claimed that there were no dead children at all, none.

When carefully examined the evidence strongly suggest that the whole North Korean Flap has been engineered as a fake, virtual false-flag on the America psyche, a very big psyop conducted by using the controlled major mass media which are all controlled by the SSG and long term victims of the CIA’s Operation Mockingbird.

Folks can assume that every secret file is now being opened and every secret honey trap video is being pulled out of various intel vaults, and every favor called upon to push US Congress-critters, state legislators and governors to “do what they are being told” about getting the guns. And favors and special deals are being promised in return, very, very lucrative personal deals.

One can probably not easily imagine the great level of manipulation and even the possible lethal threats that can be waged against obstructionists.  Many remember the crack of the rifles in Dealey Plaza, the “staged accidents” of John Tower, Gov. Carnahan, and Senator Paul Wellstone.

The SSG follows its orders explicitly without question and pulls out all the stops.

When the big boys at the central command structure in Europe at the OBN mandate major USG legislation such as the proposed gun-grabbing laws, you can bet that the SSG will pull out all stops to apply maximum pressure to folks who have the authority to institute those desires laws.

Complete Caesarian power lies at the “top of the pyramid” but only exists as long as the people fall for its cons.

It is a tragic state of affairs when a few old men who occupy the top of the “pyramid of power”, that is, comprise the very top of the organizational hierarchy or world authority, can exercise near complete authority over the heads of state and whole nations, especially America which is supposed to be a Constitutional Republic.

Of course none of this offshore control would ever have been possible if the USG had not been hijacked by the City of London Banksters in 1913-14.

If the curtain is ever pulled back to expose the Wizard of Ounce, it’s over for the top SSG and their controllers as well as the City of London Banksters.

The folks at the top of the pyramid know that once the curtain is pulled back and the Wizard of Oz (as in Ounce) is fully exposed, the jig will be up for good.  That is why they know that control over the major mass media and major broadcast TV and Radio is essential.

The fly in the ointment for these top controllers however is the worldwide Internet which was sold as the greatest intel gathering tool ever, but has turned out to have become their biggest threat ever because the alternative media on the Internet is at a point where it is surpassing mainstream, broadcast TV and radio.

High level SSG consultations have been underway for some time now on how the Internet can either be shut down or managed but so far no clear cut easy solutions have been arrived at.  It is now becoming clear that the folks at Darpa who set it up pulled a fast one on the SSG and their superiors and now there is no easy way to get out of this major flytrap.

Maintaining a major distraction to solidify the American spirit of self-defense as a nation is the cover needed to allow the USG to do things most folks would not accept.

As long as the nation is distracted by the threat of a serious nuclear WW3 with China and perhaps Russia starting on the Korean peninsula, the American people will remain almost completely distracted while the USG continues to steal them blind with increased taxes, continuing bank bailouts (Qualitative Easings) and completes their gun grabbing plans.

In short, most Americans are being bamboozled by this fake, staged virtual false flag attack on their well being and confidence while the USG continues to steal them blind and institute a NWO Globalist Agenda.

Defending the Beach?

Virtual conflicts are engineered in the secret backchannels that exist between all governments at all times but usually hidden from any public disclosure at least during the initial phases.

The use of virtual conflicts engineered in backchannel backroom meetings of senior diplomatic officials, military and intel, conflicts which are presented through major media image building to appear quite real and true threats to any nations existence, but are actually virtual false flags only.

Should these joint operations fail to attain the desired purposes for all parties as designed, fall back procedures to take these conflicts live in limited warfare even with nuclear exchanges and massive death are always a real possibility.

International conflicts can be created virtually in backroom dealings and reported in the press which are a complete fraud and  just another big lie but attain desired goals for those nations involved. If this virtual conflict is taken live, that can only happen with a backchannel agreement between the USG and China and perhaps even input from senior Russian officials.

Now for the most difficult part of this subject. Should North Korea be considered an outpost or a colony of America’s Secret Shadow Government (SSG)?

Some highly connected experts have expressed the concept that in reality North Korea should be considered an outpost or perhaps even colony of American Intel, or more accurately the Secret Shadow Government (SSG) due to the number of secret back channel deals that have been made over the years to make sure that the USG has a future viable enemy with which to battle with later.

It’s hard work creating the staging for future wars and it takes a lot of political backchannel deals over a long period of time to engineer all future conflicts and wars, even the new virtual types now. Why would these folks come to such a conclusion which seems absurd at face value, completely counter-intuitive?

Answer, because private SSG linked corporations have in the past sold arms to North Korea. Let’s look at some of the reports which have been published in the past.

Rumsfeld is reported to have arranged the sale of nuclear reactors to North Korea in 2000.

In 2000, Rumsfeld was director of a corporation that won a 200 million USD contract to sell nuclear reactors to North Korea. In 2002 Rumsfeld declared North Korea a terrorist state, part of the axis of evil and a target for regime change (1).

An article in the Utne Reader that according to Pentagon hard-liners, this deal to sell these light water nuclear reactors to North Korea by U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld who served on the board of a Swiss company that sold these reactors to the government of North Korea, could be used to produce nuclear weapons (2).

And despite all the political cross talk and cover games the SSG and US Administration were 100% on board and approved even more of these kind of deals with the their devil.

Somehow American manufactured helicopters which can easily be adapted to gunships were acquired by North Korea. The MD 500D is a civilian helicopter which North Korea imported in 1985 by circumventing United States export controls.

Ironically, the airframe of the 500D was manufactured in South Korea, was assembled in the United States, and was purchased through a German export firm. The 500D has no attack capabilities, but it can be easily modified to assume the role of a gunship. I wonder which American intel proprietary made some big bucks from this deal?

The MQM-107 was originally developed by Beech Aircraft for the United States Army Aviation and Missile Command’s 1972 Variable Speed Training Target (VSTT) requirement. It was announced as the winner 1975, and the Army took delivery of the original model (the MQM-107A) until 1979. North Korea was able to acquire these from Syria in another “back-door” secret intel deal.

For anyone that wants to check, there have been numerous reports of US military weapons being sold to China through various backdoor deals. These items can be assumed to be the “tip of the iceberg” in typical back channel military sales by proprietary intel assets on behalf of the SSG.

Conclusion

Like father like son?

When all is considered it certainly seems obvious that this so-called serious international conflict between America and North Korea is a pre-engineered Virtual Conflict, a Decepticon that will provide all leaders with some important gain, thus a win/win situation.

And if something just happens to go wrong which is unlikely even with all the warmongering and threats of a serious nuclear exchange, the parameters for that too have probably already been pre-set through the same backchannels which actually comprise a secret NWO Globalist Government that has not yet been fully and completely implemented but is certainly on the horizon.

And some experts believe that Kim Jong Un, North korea’s imperial leader is a mindkontrolled puppet that can be remotely activated by electrostim and other very advanced psychotronic means whenever belligerent and provocative statements need to be made.  Of course it is believed that he has two very experienced handlers who make sure all military actions are controlled to stay within certain pre-arranged parameters.

And the fact that all news releases are completely vetted first by the USG, we have no way of knowing what is actually being said by Mr. Un or not or any other of the parties involved unless they are shown in live video.  And much of the time they hedge facts, parse things and project falsities and lies one way or another according to prearranged talking points.

And there is always the danger that SSG could decide to take things live and stage a real false flag rather than a virtual one and blame it on the North Koreans.  If they did this would of course have to have been secretly pre-negotiated as a possible allowable default solution.

Source

Cyprus Exposed!

Thanks, Drake.

I heard that some elite families had made colossal transfers of money out of Cypriot banks prior to the “theft”, indicating it was an Illuminati job. Perhaps you did as well. Here’s some more background on what’s REALLY going on.

rtr3f0v9.si

Cypriot TV published a list of what its says is 132 multi-million dollar transfers made out of Cyprus’s banks between 1-15 March. Includes names, amounts, and dates.

Cyprus’ President-related company transfers €21mn to London prior to bailout agreement – report
http://rt.com/news/cyprus-president-money-withdraw-129/

List Released With 132 Names Who Pulled Cyprus Deposits Ahead Of “Confiscation Day”
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-04-01/list-released-132-names-who-pulled-cyprus-deposits-ahead-confiscation-day

Cyprus President’s Family Transferred Millions to London Days Before Bank Confiscations
http://intellihub.com/2013/03/31/cyprus-presidents-family-transferred-millions-to-london-days-before-bank-confiscations/

Source

 

Democrats Abandon Proposed Assault Weapons Ban

Reuters / Joshua Lott

Published time: March 19, 2013 23:07

With the US Senate set to mull new gun legislation this April, a proposed ban on assault weapons will no longer be up for debate, the proposal’s sponsors say. As a result, the ban is almost surely off the table for inclusion in a new law.

California Democrat Dianne Feinstein, who promoted the ban, told the press that Nevada’s Harry Reid made the concession with a view to avoiding Republican sabotage. Leaving out the assault weapons ban, she reasoned, would prevent the debate on gun control from being blocked by Republicans before it even began.

I very much regret it,” Feinstein, who wrote the 1994 assault weapons ban that expired ten years later, said of the decision. “I tried my best.”

Instead of debating a ban on military-style weapons up front, Feinstein will propose the measure as an amendment once legislation is in order. The ban could be on thin ice as it faces near-certain rejection from Republicans across the board as well as some Democrats.

A ban would need 60 votes to even be in the running for legislative action.

The Senate is home to 53 Democrats, as well as two independents who can be relied upon to vote to the left. But even “Using the most optimistic numbers,” Reid said, the ban would receive fewer than 40 votes.

I’m not going to try to put something on the floor that won’t succeed. I want something that will succeed. I think the worst of all worlds would be to bring to something to the floor and it dies there,” Reid said.

In order to get support, Feinstein says, the Senate will first vote on assault weapons in general – including a ban on magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. After that, a vote on high-capacity magazines would be taken to the floor.

A discussion on banning military-style weapons for civilian purchase in the US started up after years of dormancy following the December 2012 massacre at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut. In January US President Barack Obama publicly commented on such a ban in response to the Sandy Hook attack.

Restricting gun ownership and use is a majorly controversial issue in the US, where many believe the country’s constitution provides full protection of gun ownership, no matter what the style, under the law.

However, the Senate Judiciary Committee has approved four gun control measures in March 2013 alone, including the ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. The other two would see the expansion of federal background checks on individuals purchasing weapons, make punishments for illegal weapons trafficking more severe and up funding for school safety.

Source

 

Colorado Sheriffs Refused Pay Unless They Support State Gun Control Legislation

Sheriff Terry Maketa from El Paso County, Colorado has been informed by the County Sheriffs of Colorado that salaries will be halted or slashed should sheriffs not support new Colorado gun control legislation.

Maketa explained that the email “basically said, Dem. leadership is very upset with the sheriffs and their opposition to the gun control bills.”

 

Should sheriffs continue to be publicly vocal about not complying with a federal or state gun grab, they will suffer financially.

Marketa explained further that the email originated with the Colorado Sheriffs Association. It concerned a perceived upset by Colorado Senate Democrats and response that would effectively hold pay hostage for Constitutional sheriffs.

Last week the Colorado State Senate and House saw multiple gun control legislation come through for approval, and these were successful:

• SB 195 prohibiting online certification of concealed carry permit
• SB 197 ban domestic violence perpetrators from owning a gun
• HB 1224 limit magazines to 15 rounds
• HB 1228 gun buyers pay for background check
• HB 1229 require background check for commercial/private sales

Gun manufacturers have begun to refuse shipment and sale of their products in states that restrict citizen’s 2nd Amendment rights. Called the Firearms Equality Movement, the number of participants has risen from 34 to 118.

House Representative Jan Schakowsky has let the cat out of the bag on gun control. Schkaowsky said, at a rally for pro-women’s rights, that a ban on assault weapons, high capacity magazines and mandatory universal background checks on commercial and private sales are just the beginning.

Schkaowsky said: “We want everything on the table. This is a moment of opportunity. There’s no question about it. . . We’re on a roll now, and I think we’ve got to take the––you know, we’re gonna push as hard as we can and as far as we can.”

The issue for Schkaowsky is that circumventing the 2nd Amendment as it is currently written can be achieved with the assistance of municipalities and communities banning gun ownership in their district and within their borders.

Source

 

Why the Illuminati Can’t Control the American People

gun collection

I’m Canadian and not into guns, (I’ve never even held one) and because of my upbringing, where my grandparents had a couple of shotguns and rifles for hunting woodchucks in the farmers’ fields with permission, and annual duck and deer hunting, this whole gun scenario is fascinating to me.

When we immigrated to the USA we were taken aback at all the stores with giant signs out front advertising guns and ammunition. We sometimes do an informal poll with people we meet and it seems like the average is for most Americans to have about three guns of some kind at home. The actual statistics are staggering to me.

The photo here is a pictorial inventory of the arsenal our Texas friends have at their home here in Arizona. This is your average family I’m talking about; husband, wife, three great kids (one boy, two girls), a dog, good jobs, church-goers, kind and gentle people.

They like to hunt, and have a hunting dog. Apparently they also like their guns. Do they hunt with these guns? I think so… They’re not “gun collectors” per se. Regardless, we’ve discussed this gun confiscation issue, and they don’t believe it’s possible to disarm the American people.

Our sheriff doesn’t either. He sent a letter to Obama saying he would not support anti-gun legislation because he took an oath as a law enforcement officer to uphold the Constitution and protect The People.

I believe this photo is a perfect example of why the U.S.A. Corporation will NEVER be able to take away the guns from The People of the Republic. This is just the way many Americans are—and they are NOT going to simply hand them over because Uncle Sam says they have to. They are awake now—perhaps not to absolutely EVERYTHING that’s going on or that has transpired—but the gun grab got their attention and from what I’m hearing, The People went out and bought more guns, and more ammo than ever before—as in “cleaned off the shelves”.

There just may be an army of civilians out there—outside the well regulated militias—and I say, “Good for you, America.” Most other countries unthinkingly gave up their guns and look what it got them, just as it did throughout history on this planet: T-Y-R-A-N-N-Y. Now we have to undo the damage, and the world looks to the USA to make sure that happens. And it will.

 

Iowa on Verge of Legalizing Raw Milk; Resistance to Food Tyranny is Rising

This is wonderful news! Too many farmers have been terrorized for selling raw milk. It has to end and this is a powerful step in the right direction. The People are taking their power back.

Like Mike, I drink almond milk rather than cow’s milk, but good for Iowa!

By Mike Adams
Natural News
March 1, 2013

Iowa is on the verge of legalizing raw milk sales from dairy farms, and legislation has been introduced for that purpose.

Raw milk is currently illegal to sell across most of the United States of America, the “land of the free” where freedom has been systematically crushed by oppressive government.

Cuba doesn’t outlaw raw milk. China doesn’t outlaw raw milk. Even North Korea doesn’t outlaw raw milk. Raw milk is legal to buy, sell and drink in Peru, Ecuador, Panama and most Central and South American countries.

But in America, the FDA mandates that all milk be pasteurized, and this obscenely ignorant rule has resulted in a pandemic of milk allergies, digestive disorders, milk-caused autoimmune disorders and also the criminalization of raw dairy farmers.

Only in America is a raw milk farmer raided at gunpoint, thrown in jail, stripped of his operating cash and forced to turn over his entire inventory which is then destroyed by the government.

Consumers want to buy raw milk!

“The reason this bill is important is we have a growing constituency in Iowa who wants access to this product,” Rep. Jason Schultz, R-Schleswig said in the Daily Iowan. The paper goes on to report:

Schultz, the committee chairman, said he supports the bill because if consumers can buy raw meat and raw eggs, there is no reason they shouldn’t be able to buy raw milk.

The story goes on to discuss the opposition to the raw milk idea, but all such opposition is based on a foolish argument: That the world must be made sanitary in order to be safe.

For the record, I personally don’t drink cow’s milk. I prefer almond milk. But even though I do not personally choose to drink cow’s milk, I fully support consumer choice so that those who wish to purchase this product may do so freely. (I support the principle of free choice.)

By the same token, I do not drink alcohol, yet I support the freedom of others to consume alcohol if they so choose. This is the essence of freedom.

The failed arguments of raw milk opponents

The process of cooking raw milk makes it less digestible. It promotes constipation, sinus congestion and digestive disorders. That’s because heat destroys the lactase enzymes, present in raw milk, which help digest lactose.

If you destroy the lactase enzymes, you can’t properly digest the lactose. Symptoms of this can get you labeled “lactose intolerant” when, in reality, you’re just drinking cooked milk that’s been nutritionally destroyed.

Even beyond that, since when did the government actually try to protect people from dangerous products, anyway? C’mon, you can buy cigarettes at the grocery store, and those cause cancer and heart disease.

You can buy aspartame and MSG, yet nobody in government wants to ban those toxic chemicals in the food.

Processed meats cause huge spikes in cancer rates due to their use of sodium nitrite, a cancer-causing color additive chemical that turns meats red. Yet you don’t see anybody in government talking about “saving the lives of children from cancer” caused by processed meats.

The idea that government tries to protect the people is hogwash. The entire argument against raw milk is nothing more than a monopolistic power grab by the conventional dairy industry. “Big dairy” is the force that’s actually behind the criminalization of raw milk.

It’s no different than the AMA trying to destroy alternative medicine… or Big Pharma trying to discredit holistic herbal therapies. It’s always about a monopoly, and right now there’s a huge monopoly in the dairy industry.

That very same industry, by the way, now wants to secretly add aspartame to milk, yogurt and cream products, even while getting FDA approval to not list aspartame on the label.

(Yes, you read that correctly: They want to change the “definition” of milk to include aspartame, thus it does not need to be listed on the label because it’s not an extra ingredient anymore… it’s just part of the milk!)

If the dairy industry was really worried about the safety of milk customers, why would it want to secretly add a neurotoxic chemical sweetener to many of its dairy products?

Why would it petition the FDA to hide that ingredient from consumers? (And what else is the industry hiding?)

With the dairy industry, it’s always about deception. It’s about using the excuse of “public safety” to enforce its monopoly while actually harming its own customers.

Sterilizing all your food does not make you a healthier person

Sterile food is not necessarily healthy food! Killing everything in the food may minimize the risk of some bacteria, but it also kills the very things that make food nutritious.

But since nearly all the popular food sold across America is already dead, I suppose people don’t even recognize real food when they see it anymore. Real food isn’t pasteurized, and it’s not risk-free.

Life isn’t risk-free. You take a risk when you walk outside your door. You take a huge risk driving in a car, but I don’t see anyone screaming for government to ban automobiles in order to prevent the 32,000+ auto fatalities each year.

Government cannot eliminate risk in your life. Anyone who tries to use government to even attempt such a foolish thing only ends up creating a tyranny that crushes freedom and makes our lives more miserable.

I ask you this: Would you rather be FREE and live with a little bit of risk, or would you rather be sanitized by a control freak government that tells you what to eat? I would rather be free. LET ME DECIDE whether I want to drink raw milk or not, okay?

Raw milk should be legal everywhere as long as it’s accurately labeled and comes with a commonsense warning about the (very small) possibility of bacterial contamination.

Gun Companies Boycotting Law Enforcement In Anti-Gun States Grow by More Than 700% in One Week

This unprecedented opposition to limiting gun sales to The People is astonishing and so good to see. The statements these gun manufacturers/sellers have made are VERY good. (see below)

Who would have thought they’d turn around and restrict sales to LEOs? It’s an impressive counter, don’t you think? There are many peaceful ways to make our stand against tyranny and more are revealed every week it seems.

February 25, 2013

The list of companies that have decided to stop selling firearms and ammunition to law enforcement agencies, in states that are hostile to the Second Amendment and putting forth gun control legislation, is growing and has grown more than seven times the number that I informed you about one week ago today.

Previously I listed the following companies:

Now the list has expanded to include:

Jeffrey Norton, of Norton Firearms, issued a statement on the company’s website:

Norton Firearms, Inc. is a strong defender of the US Constitution, not only the 2nd amendment. We believe that a government that restricts it Citizens from executing their Constitutional Rights is no longer a government for the people or by the people. It is our policy not to sell our products or services to any organization that tries to diminish the rights given to us by our US Constitution and our Creator. If you are a government agency with a policy of restricting our Constitutional Rights we ask that you take our tax dollars and spend it somewhere else. I am sure there is some profiteering communist foreign company that will be glad to take our dollars for their gain. We will only sell to law abiding Citizens and those agencies that truly support and will defend The US Constitution.

Others, like Kiss Tactical, posted to their Facebook page:

On Saturday I refused to sell a AR-15 rifle to a police officer from California. He came into my shop and wanted to buy his duty gun in AZ because the same gun in his home state would cost him more.

I told him that I would not sell him the gun even though he had his department letter saying he was able to buy it. I told him that if the gun was not legal for law abiding men and women in CA I would not sell it to him. After he told me that “civilians don’t need them type of guns,” I asked to leave my shop. He stomped out mad.

I have made a decision to not sell to any gun to police department that are not legal for civilians. We build custom AR-15 and have sold more then a few to cops in a few states. I am not sure how this will effect us but as we grow and our name gets out there more we will not change this policy.

Following New York’s gun control laws, Steve Adelmann, of Citizen Arms, made the following statement on the home page of his company’s website:

”Due to legal, ethical and moral concerns, Citizen Arms offers only those custom firearms that are legal for all lawful citizens of a given state to possess, regardless of law enforcement status. LE personnel living in states where citizens must have restrictive features will only receive like product support from Citizen Arms.

We’re very appreciative of the sacrifices made by the law enforcement community but we’re even more appreciative of the right guaranteed to all law-abiding US citizens by the Second Amendment to the US Constitution: ‘A well regulated militia, necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.’”

If you know of other companies that are joining in this protest against attacks by tyrannical Federal and State governments, please click on the “Contact” button at the top of the page and send me a link to the company’s statement and I’ll add it to the growing list. Please consider supporting companies like these as they value freedom and the responsibility we have to both keep and bear arms.

Firearms Policy Coalition offers a digital option for those wishing to send an email encouraging companies to get on board with this movement.

Ronnie Barrett posted the following letter at the company’s Facebook page:

Barrett opposes those who are illegally disarming the American public from their efficient arms and creating superior armed elitist government agencies.

Elected state officials of New York, having been sworn to protect our Constitution, have instead committed an offense against it and their citizens by stripping inalienable rights duly protected and guaranteed under the Second Amendment. By their deliberate and sinister actions, these officials now cause their state and local policing agencies to enforce these unconstitutional and illegal so called “laws”.

By current law, Barrett cannot be an accomplice with any lawbreaker, therefore, cannot and will not service or sell to New York government agencies. Barrett also applies this stance to the individual elected official who, as a matter of public record, has voted for or created regulation that violates the constitutional rights of their citizens. This is an expansion of our 2002 ban against the California government due to their second amendment infringements, and shall apply to any future violators.

In the course of world history there have been officials that strip inalienable rights from the people that were given to all by our Creator. Most of these officials inevitably come to trial, some do not.

Intentionally violating constitutional rights by officials that have sworn to uphold them should have severe prison sentences.

With the clear vision of horrible events in history repeating itself, all manufacturers of firearms or related equipment remaining in partnership with such violators should have a respectable fear of being found with the guilty on their day of trial.

During this era of assault on liberty, Barrett will remain steadfast in our efforts to serve law-abiding citizens of all fifty states, and stands together with you in the struggles we will fight and win.

Ronnie Barrett
Chairman and CEO

UPDATE: Phil Flack of P.F. Custom Guns in Asheville, N.C. sent me this message:

Effective immediately, P. F. Custom Guns will not sell to or support in anyway Government agencies in states where their elected Officials are destroying our Constitution and American way of life for the citizens of their state. While we are all shocked at recent tragic events in our nation and we send heartfelt prayers for the Families of the victims. Knee jerk reactions from purely political opportunist, in my mind, just a slap in the face to these Families. These same politicians should be apologizing for their past actions of not allowing free citizens the God given right to defend themselves, their homes and certainly their children. This is NOT the Country that I put on a uniform to defend. I will not stand by or continue to support any State Government or their agencies or sub-divisions that do not fully support our Constitution.

UPDATE: George Pouliotte of Ammodump International LLC wrote to tell me that his company has been refusing to sell firearms to states hostile to the guns and gun owners since 1989. “This is not new to my company”, he wrote.

UPDATE: Thunder Beast Arms is on board as well. Their stated policy reads:

Due to the recent attacks against lawful civilian firearms ownership and use, Thunder Beast Arms Corporation is adopting a policy of equal treatment for government entity sales and commercial sales.

Effective immediately, we will not sell to any state or any of its political subdivisions in which a law-abiding resident could not legally obtain, possess, or use the same firearm, silencer, or accessory due to laws in that state or political subdivision. To put it simply, if you can’t have it, they can’t have it.

UPDATE: GWACS Armory put out this statement via their Facebook page:

GWACS Armory will NOT sell or transfer any GWACS CAV-15 (full-auto or semi-auto) to any Law Enforcement Agency or other Department or Agency within the borders and jurisdiction of any State that passes laws to specifically restrict the rights of law abiding citizens to buy and own guns produced by GWACS Armory for their private security and legal use…

UPDATE: Antares Arms states quite simply on their front page:

Be Advised: We refuse to recognize law enforcement exemptions on gun control.

If a product that we sell is not legal for a law-abiding private citizen to own in a jurisdiction, we will not sell that product to a law-enforcement agency in that jurisdiction.

UPDATE: One reader of Freedom Outpost sent me this email, demonstrating that Climags.com is supporting the boycott as well. According to Climags Frequently Asked Questions:

Q. Why was my Order Cancelled?

A. Typically it is because the items you ordered are not legal in either the place where it is being shipped to or your billing address. Please double check our High Capacity Laws page. We do NOT make exceptions for Military or Law Enforcement, if you want to possess these items please get involved with your local politics. If your order is cancelled you will be issued a refund and emailed a reason for the cancellation.

UPDATE: Freedom Outpost’s own Tom Wise with Amendment Arms, sent me this email in regards to his company’s policy. He told me I could quote him on it:

Definitely. First, our FAQ makes clear that we do not recognize a federal government which does not recognize legal contracts. Second, my article “Pro-Gun Advocates are Just Paranoid” provides the necessary logic that if police in New York carry weapons which the citizenry is prohibited from owning, the police are either breaking the law or they’re not citizens but part of an unequal elite.

Oddly, this is the charge Marx leveled against capitalist society, that the police are there to defend wealth. Very true, but the Leftists merely seize the “means of protection” (to coin a phrase) and utilize it against those who created it!

In a nutshell, we will not sell the Joshua Mk5 or any other weapon to this federal government administration, because we believe them to be corrupt, conniving, and working in concert to disassemble liberty. We will not sell our weaponry to New York law enforcement.

We will require California law enforcement to have a bullet button and 10-round magazine, just like their citizens. We will not sell to any law enforcement in any state which we know has a bill or proposal on the table to limit or exclude our weaponry. We do this to make the philosophical point, and to keep the odds even.

Source

Now 44 Gun Companies Have Stopped Selling to Law Enforcement In Anti-2nd Amendment States

Gaining Momentum Now 44 Gun Companies Have Stopped Selling to Law Enforcement In Anti-2nd Amendment States

I don’t think the U.S.A Corporation is going to succeed in taking away The People’s weapons, do you? Nahhhhh. Not in a million years.

The best thing about gun confiscation is that it woke up a lot of people who otherwise would probably still be asleep. Nice.

The list of companies that have stopped selling firearms and ammunition to law enforcement agencies in states that are restricting the Second Amendment has more than doubled since Wednesday and is more than five times larger than just one week ago. There are 44 companies on our list, with more being added as we receive notification. Here are the additions since Wednesday:

Here’s a sample of statements from some of the recent additions to the list as well as the positions of the companies that have reached out to TheBlaze directly to declare their policy shift:
List Gun Companies Not Selling To Law Enforcement Is Growing Faster

Steve Adelmann of Citizen Arms shared the following from his company’s statement, made the day after New York changed its laws:

 ”Due to legal, ethical and moral concerns, Citizen Arms offers only those custom firearms that are legal for all lawful citizens of a given state to possess, regardless of law enforcement status. LE personnel living in states where citizens must have restrictive features will only receive like product support from Citizen Arms. We’re very appreciative of the sacrifices made by the law enforcement community but we’re even more appreciative of the right guaranteed to all law-abiding US citizens by the Second Amendment to the US Constitution: A well regulated militia, necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”.

List Gun Companies Not Selling To Law Enforcement Is Growing Faster

On February 20th, as our story was hitting the web, Ronnie Barrett, the Chairman and CEO of Barrett Firearms posted his company’s position statement on their Facebook page:

Barrett’s Position Regarding the Assault on Liberty

Barrett opposes those who are illegally disarming the American public from their efficient arms and creating superior armed elitist government agencies.

Elected state officials of New York, having been sworn to protect our Constitution, have instead committed an offense against it and their citizens by stripping inalienable rights duly protected and guaranteed under th…e Second Amendment. By their deliberate and sinister actions, these officials now cause their state and local policing agencies to enforce these unconstitutional and illegal so called “laws”.

By current law, Barrett cannot be an accomplice with any lawbreaker, therefore, cannot and will not service or sell to New York government agencies. Barrett also applies this stance to the individual elected official who, as a matter of public record, has voted for or created regulation that violates the constitutional rights of their citizens. This is an expansion of our 2002 ban against the California government due to their second amendment infringements, and shall apply to any future violators.

In the course of world history there have been officials that strip inalienable rights from the people that were given to all by our Creator. Most of these officials inevitably come to trial, some do not.

Intentionally violating constitutional rights by officials that have sworn to uphold them should have severe prison sentences.

With the clear vision of horrible events in history repeating itself, all manufacturers of firearms or related equipment remaining in partnership with such violators should have a respectable fear of being found with the guilty on their day of trial.

During this era of assault on liberty, Barrett will remain steadfast in our efforts to serve law-abiding citizens of all fifty states, and stands together with you in the struggles we will fight and win.

List Gun Companies Not Selling To Law Enforcement Is Growing Faster

Jeffrey Norton of Norton Firearms not only sends a message about the Second Amendment, but also reminds folks that our rights come to us from “our US Constitution and our Creator.”

Norton Firearms, Inc. is a strong defender of the US Constitution, not only the 2nd amendment. We believe that a government that restricts it Citizens from executing their Constitutional Rights is no longer a government for the people or by the people. It is our policy not to sell our products or services to any organization that tries to diminish the rights given to us by our US Constitution and our Creator. If you are a government agency with a policy of restricting our Constitutional Rights we ask that you take our tax dollars and spend it somewhere else. I am sure there is some profiteering communist foreign company that will be glad to take our dollars for their gain. We will only sell to law abiding, Citizens and those agencies that truly support and will defend The US Constitution.

List Gun Companies Not Selling To Law Enforcement Is Growing Faster

Doug Prince of Evolution Weaponry told TheBlaze, “Evolution Weaponry is proud to say you can add us to that list.”

I am a US Army veteran. I received a medical discharge due to combat related injuries after 6 years of service. I am a strong believer in American veterans, the US Constitution and individual liberty. My service to this country is among my greatest accomplishments in my life to this point and I carry what I have learned from that into every endeavor I undertake.

List Gun Companies Not Selling To Law Enforcement Is Growing Faster

Arizona’s Kiss Tactical’s Facebook page also carries a story about denying a California police officer’s request to purchase an AR-15.

On Saturday I refused to sell a AR-15 rifle to a police officer from California. He came into my shop and wanted to buy his duty gun in AZ because the same gun in his home state would cost him more. I told him that I would not sell him the gun even though he had his department letter saying he was able to buy it. I told him that if the gun was not legal for law abiding men and women in CA, I would not sell it to him. after he told me that “civilians don’t need them type of guns” I asked to leave my shop. as he stomped out mad.

List Gun Companies Not Selling To Law Enforcement Is Growing Faster

Doublestar Corporation (which includes J&T Distributing, DoubleStar Corp., Ace Limited, and the DoubleStar Training Academy) will also be unavailable to law enforcement and government agencies in states suppressing citizen’s rights.

Effective immediately, the J&T Family of Companies will be joining other manufacturers and distributors by ceasing sales of regulated items in states that have altered the rights of citizens to keep and bear arms.

There are also a host of smaller outlets taking a stand.

List Gun Companies Not Selling To Law Enforcement Is Growing Faster

Witness the recent news from Old Grouch’s Military Surplus in North Carolina:

In support of our customers in the state of New York, effective today we are cancelling all orders to any state or municipal government agency customers in the New York and will accept no more. While we can’t stop the trampling of rights that is occurring there, we certainly can make sure we don’t assist in it in any way going forward.

Source

Sheriff Brad Rogers on CNN ‘Guns Under Fire’ with Anderson Cooper [video]

Well, Sheriff Rogers got his 2 minutes in the sun but true to CNN style, he was discredited to some degree.

Nevertheless, he stated he and other sheriffs do not and will not support unconstitutional laws and will protect The People, as they swore they would do when they took their oath.