The Original 13th Amendment (in Depth)

Restoring Common Law will immediately invalidate such things as Common Core, ObamaCare, and Agenda 21. -LW

Most people do not realize that the well-known thirteenth amendment – that which ended slavery in America – was not the first “Thirteenth” amendment proposed. As any Constitutional scholar (or anyone remotely familiar with American History) can readily tell you, the thirteenth amendment to the United States Constitution is an important one. Perhaps even the most important one of all. As most students learned at some point in school but quickly forgot, the thirteenth amendment that is so well known today was ratified by congress in 1865, and effectively abolished slavery in the United States.

While this amendment didn’t exactly end racism once and for all (it’s proven rather difficult to make laws to that effect), it certainly was quite an important step in that direction.

But the true history of the thirteenth amendment actually goes back much farther than The Civil War, and has very little to do with slavery.

The story begins in 1810, fifty-five years before slavery would be abolished.

There was a young woman from Baltimore, Ms. Betsy Patterson. This young lady, in some kind of flight of youthful fancy, moved to England, where she married Napoleon Bonaparte’s younger brother, Jerome, and with him had a child, young Jerome Napoleon Bonaparte (the young couple were clearly not known for coming up with clever names). Now, because of his mother’s heritage, this child by law was granted automatic citizenship into the United States, while at the same time retaining a status of nobility in France, being Napoleon’s nephew and all.

There were many among the nobles in America who viewed this as a travesty to their own national identity, and quite a good reason to add a little something to the Constitution that was apparently missing.

And thus was born the Titles of Nobility Act; a proposed constitutional amendment (it would be, of course, the 13th) stating that any citizen of the U.S. who receives a title of nobility or honor from a foreign nation without the consent of congress must be forced to give up his or her citizenship in the United States.

Apparently, the proposed amendment must have sounded quite good to congress at the time, as it passed quickly through both houses by quite a wide majority, then was sent down to the individual state legislatures to be voted on (as article 5 of the constitution requires). It is here that the amendment finally found trouble.

Such an amendment would have required approval of two thirds of the states for ratification. After three years of debate (as the War of 1812 continued to rage), the amendment finally fell just shy of the required state approval, and thus was not added to the constitution.

Or was it?

The Short, But Interesting, Legacy For several decades, it was quite a common misconception among many Americans that the Titles of Nobility Act had, in fact, been approved. Much of this can probably be blamed, one must suppose, on the yet-primitive methods of communication available in the nineteenth century. In fact, communication over long distances hadn’t been much improved over the previous several centuries at this point, apart from the introduction of the steam engine, which hadn’t yet caught on at this point, having been invented only a few years previously.

Similarly, the telegraph wouldn’t come for a few more decades, then the phone a few decades after that. In fact, word that the Titles of Nobility Act had failed spread so poorly that the amendment was actually included in several printings of the constitution during this time before the folks at the printing presses themselves finally got a clue. Eventually, it seems that people began to realize the error of their ways, though it wouldn’t surprise me if more than a few people were a bit confused when congress took it upon themselves to issue another thirteenth amendment forty years later.

Of course, this is not the end of the story. Even today, there is absolutely no end of websites and message boards (including the “Titles of Nobility Act Research Comittee”) who declare the Titles of Nobility Act to have been passed in truth, but then swept under the rug by a vast government conspiracy. It’s an intersting thought, to be sure, but constitutional scholars tend to agree that the amendment did not, in fact, pass. If they somehow could have conspired to remove the act from the constitution, however, this surely deserves some sort of praise, as such a thing must not have been easy.

In closing, here are just a few of the many people who would lose their citizenship should such an amendment go into effect today: George H.W. Bush, Norman Schwarzkopf, Rudy Giuliani, and even Bill Gates; for all of these men have one important thing in common: they have been granted honorary knighthood from Britain.

AMERICANS CONTINUALLY DECEIVED!
LEGAL MENTALITY – LIE!

1479211
The amendment was also ratified by Virginia (state # 13): Virginia ratified the amendment on February 7, 1812. The state’s official records were burned when the British set fire to Washingtonand Richmond during the War of 1812, but numerous other records prove the amendment was ratified.

Nevertheless, the federal government insists the amendment never became law. This is a scan from a copy of “Military Laws of the United States,” by Trueman Cross. Published in 1825 by Edward de Krafft of Washington. Many books and official government documents printed between about 1820 to 1860 contain the original 13th amendment. It was never repealed.

In 1812, the votes of 13 states were needed to ratify an amendment.
The federal government admits the Titles of Nobility Amendment was
ratified by 12:

  1. Maryland (December 25, 1810)
  2. Kentucky (January 31, 1811)
  3. Ohio (January 31, 1811)
  4. Delaware (February 2, 1811)
  5. Pennsylvania (February 6, 1811)
  6. New Jersey (February 13, 1811)
  7. Vermont (October 24, 1811)
  8. Tennessee (November 21, 1811)
  9. Georgia (November 22, 1811)
  10. North Carolina (December 23, 1811)
  11. Massachusetts (February 27, 1812)
  12. New Hampshire (December 9, 1812)

Source.

The Original 13th Amendment (in Brief)

The original 13th Amendment was secretly removed during the US Civil War. It was discovered in 1983 by David Dodge and Tom Dunn in a Belfast Library on the coast of Maine.  They uncovered the United States Constitution printed in 1825, which was to prohibit lawyers from serving in government.

Since this Amendment was never officially removed from US law, it is stil on the books, and still in effect.  How many Congressmen or Senators do you know who came from careers as lawyers?

Read all about it here.

Latest US False Flag in Syria from James Corbett [video]

From BrasscheckTV…

Are they really going to pull this again to involve the US in yet another overseas disaster?

Are people really going to buy it?

The logic and illogic of the recent chemical war attack on civilians in Syria – and who the most likely culprits are?

Will people really buy this story? We’re big fans of James Corbett and we’re in agreement with what you’d think would be obvious points.

To recap:

1. The Syrian government has been winning the “civil war” so there is hardly any need for dramatic and desperate measures.

2. The so-called “rebels” are the ones who’ve threatened chemical attacks and have been caught engaging in them. Syria, which has been at war several times in the last five decades, has no record of using them.

3. It would be utterly irrational not to mention personally suicidal for Bashar al-Assad, the leader of Syria, to use such weapons. He’s shrewd enough to know that by doing so he would invite UN sanctions and a NATO/US invasion.

So if the US/State Department line is not credible then what is?

We now know that the Spanish did not sink the USS Maine in Havana harbor, but that incident was enough to start the Spanish American War – and give the US a reason to take Cuba and the Philippines from the weak hand of Spain.

We also now know there was ample warning that the Japanese were preparing an attack on Peal Harbor and that this information was not passed on to the commander there.

The Gulf of Tonkin “attack” on US naval vessels off the coast of Vietnam has been demonstrated to have been a fraud and the recent War in Iraq was based on the existence of “weapons of mass destruction” that turned out not to exist.

The staging of incidents – including incidents that result in the death of innocent people – in order to justify military actions being carried out for entirely different motives is not a new thing and, as outrageous as it may seem to normal, decent minded people, it’s not uncommon.

Is Syria another case of this?

We don’t have the answer, but if we were betting, we’d bet on James Corbett’s analysis on this one.

- Brasscheck

Source 

COBRA Update: Victory of the Light in Egypt!

In North America, the daily meditation is now 8 a.m. Pacific, 5 a.m. EST, every day until further notice. They’re not out of the woods yet!

COBRA’s interpretation of events is just a little different from the MSM, isn’t it? Let’s hope the Russian troops on American soil are equally as benevolent as the Egyptian positive military.

I think this is the first time I’ve seen the Templars overtly used in a positive connotation, and we will soon learn that the Templars were originally a positive force in Humanity’s history, and continue to be. They were given a bad name, and that’s just one facet of the diamond among many that is “not what it seems”. Their story is a fascinating one.

Victory of the Light in Egypt

Posted: 05 Jul 2013 03:43 AM PDT
As you probably know, a big victory of the Light has been achieved.  In the first large scale coordinated action of the Positive Military in the human history, the Archon-infested Muslim Brotherhood has been removed from power in Egypt.

This action is a result of many months of careful preparation and joint cooperation between the Positive Military, Templars, Resistance Movement and even White Dragons, supported by the human masses.

The action was triggered on July 3rd, which is the moment of Sun-Sirius conjunction, a very powerful Isis portal. It is interesting to note that the name of the Egyptian General Sisi is an anagram of Isis. Mass invocations of Goddess energy have supported the operation of the Light forces and ensured stability and peace throughout the process.

This was one of the main rehearsals for the Event. The experience at the Event will be similar in a way, although it will happen on a scale a hundred times larger. The Resistance has gathered a lot of precious intel about the behavior of human population in situations like this, which will be very useful in fine-tuning the masterplan for the Event.

Although a big victory has been achieved, the story is not over yet. Egypt still has Rothschild-controlled central bank. The Light forces suggest a creation of independent central bank of Egypt which will ensure true independence from the Cabal. The Cabal might try to destabilize the liberation process in Egypt by trying to bribe the military, by supporting the formation of Muslim Brotherhood militias, by manipulating the election process, creating false flag attacks and trying to ignite a civil war.

All this will be in vain as the people of Egypt are awake, aware and strong enough to bring the liberation process to its final completion.

It is still very important to support this process with our daily Liberation Meditations for Egypt every day at 3 pm GMT, which is 5 pm Cairo time.

You can find the time for your time zone here (it is the same every day):

http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Liberation+Meditation+3&iso=20130703T17&p1=53

The Youtube video for the meditation is here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkjW3u3yTCU

 

And instructions for the meditation here:

…and Still Further Clarification of The One People’s Public Trust

I’m hoping that by sharing an aggregate of many takes on this Trust that those who are still suspicious and unable to make sense of the “new age legalese” can come to a definitive understanding and informed decision as to what it is and what it means to We, The People of Earth. Together, we can do this.

Thank you Lightworker 29501 for YOUR research and lay terms. Great job!

Starting to Piece it Together…

by Lightworker 29501  All About 2012

After having some time to digest the TOPPT interviews from a few weeks ago and those on Free American, November 2011, I think I’m understanding what’s going on, a bit better…

Here goes…

The legalese confounds me, but if I read it correctly, the trustees of the One People’s Public Trust have become trustees for the the trust that was formed in 1776, and later abandoned by President Lincoln, because the Civil War created a situation where his government was unable to perform their duties, by virtue of the seceded colonies/states.

Lincoln unwittingly created an opportunity for the cabalists to takeover the US government, when he created the shadow government and failed to state when/how that shadow government would be terminated.

Okay… so the two-year terms for Congress were originally instituted as terms for trustees, right? Farmers would be trustees of the People’s Trust 1776 for two years at a time.

(I only say “farmers” because the USA was an agriculture-based society, at the time.)

So, TOPPT effectively remedies Lincoln’s mistake, since the People’s Trust 1776 has been reclaimed, and supersedes USA, Inc. This also eliminates current-day politicians, because their positions will soon be replaced with trustees of the People’s Public Trust 1776, hence the month-long elections that we’ve been told are coming when all of this stuff finally happens.

Then, if the public trust doctrine, which dates back to the Magna Carta and Roman civilization, is all about managing the land, does this explain why only land-owners could vote, way back in 1776? Did it have more to do with being a protector of the land than discriminating against “low-brow commoners”?

_____________________________________________________

Interesting question…

 

Russia Tells U.S. Citizens, Don’t Give Up Your Guns: We Learned From Experience Fighting Rothschild’s Banking Schemes!

militia

Britain has told America not to give up their guns, and now Russia. Maybe there were others, too. I just can’t see Americans letting anyone take their guns. I think there would be civil war, first. With the way the militias are growing, though, it probably wouldn’t come to that . ‘Minuteman’ Rick Light of the Well Regulated Militias says there are so many  new members it’s impossible to keep track of them at this point.

 

These days, there are few few things to admire about the socialist, bankrupt and culturally degenerating USA, but at least so far, one thing remains: the right to bear arms and use deadly force to defend one’s self and possessions.

putin-gun

Russia’s Vladimir Putin Does A 1776 Revolution On Rothschild’s Ass: John McCain’s Seditious Magnitsky Act!

NWO’s Mitt Romney’s Warmonger Campaign: Paints Russia As The #1 Enemy ~ As Putin Removed Banking Cabalist Rothschild From Russia In 2006!

This will probably come as a total shock to most of my Western readers, but at one point, Russia was one of the most heavily armed societies on earth. This was, of course, when we were free under the Tsar. Weapons, from swords and spears to pistols, rifles and shotguns were everywhere, common items. People carried them concealed, they carried them holstered. Fighting knives were a prominent part of many traditional attires and those little tubes criss crossing on the costumes of Cossacks and various Caucasian peoples? Well those are bullet holders for rifles.

Various armies, such as the Poles, during the Смута (Times of Troubles), or Napoleon, or the Germans even as the Tsarist state collapsed under the weight of WW1 and Wall Street monies, found that holding Russian lands was much much harder than taking them and taking was no easy walk in the park but a blood bath all its own. In holding, one faced an extremely well armed and aggressive population Hell bent on exterminating or driving out the aggressor.

This well armed population was what allowed the various White factions to rise up, no matter how disorganized politically and militarily they were in 1918 and wage a savage civil war against the Reds. It should be noted that many of these armies were armed peasants, villagers, farmers and merchants, protecting their own. If it had not been for Washington’s clandestine support of and for the Reds, history would have gone quite differently.

Read the rest of the Article…