Staggering, Eye-Opening History of Britain’s Monarchy and Its Colonies and Why the Crown is Being Dismantled

Kevin Annett shared this with regard to Canada’s current steps to sever remaining ties to the Crown, and urges the other colonies to do the same because the British Monarchy is a sham and must be abolished to return us all to sovereign beings and nations.  

He says, “our colleagues in England, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand must take precisely the same step.” 

 Kevin’s history lesson is certainly one that never found its way into MY classes at school.  Fascinating, and good to know that we are systematically taking the air out of the corrupt government and justice system across the board in favour of Common Law—the only REAL Law of the Land.  ~ BP

King Charles Stuart

FROM KEVIN ANNETT ;-) Republic of Kanata Background Paper No. 1 -

The Basis for the Republic of Kanata and of England:

The History and Lawfulness of the Abolition of the “Crown” – A Brief Survey of Constitutional and Legal Precedents, and Applying them to our Work Today

The Commons of England assembled in Parliament declare that the people under God are the origin of all just power … and have the supreme authority of the nation. Whatsoever is enacted and declared law by the Commons alone has the force of law, and all the people are included thereby, with or without the consent of the king.
- An Act to Establish the High Court of Justice, House of Commons, London, January 4, 1649

It has been found by experience that the office of a monarch in this nation holding such power in any single person is unnecessary, burdensome, and dangerous to the liberty, safety, and public interest of the people … Be it therefore an Act ordained by the present Parliament, that the office of a king or other monarch in this nation shall not henceforth reside in or be exercised by any one single person and that monarchy be dispensed with in its entirety, as the chief threat to the people’s well being.

- An Act Abolishing the Office of King, House of Commons, London, March 17, 1649

For it is clear both by scripture and the laws of England that monarchs are anathema to divine law. Kings are of man’s creation, not God’s, and therefore they stand under judgement and the common law.
- John Cooke, public prosecutor of King Charles 1 (from “Monarchy: No Creature of God’s Making, Waterford, 1651)

Let the Chosen be joyful in glory; let the high Judgements of the Lord be in their mouths, and God’s sword be in their hands, to execute justice against the rulers, and to bind their kings in chains, and their nobles with fetters of iron, so that they may execute upon them the judgement that is from God. This is the honour given to God’s Chosen. (Psalm 149:5-9)
- Cited in the Judgement of the High Court’s trial of Charles Stuart, 1649
…………………..

On January 30, 1649, the King of England, Charles Stuart, was executed in London after being lawfully convicted by a Parliamentary High Court of Justice for treason and conducting a war against the laws and people of England.

Weeks later, on March 17, 1649, the English Crown, including the Monarchy and the House of Lords, was legally and forever abolished and constitutionally prohibited in England. It was declared a treasonable act to attempt to re-establish monarchy and proclaim anyone King or Queen.

Eleven years later, this defunct royal power was reimposed on England and its colonies, fraudulently and illegally, by a military coup of Charles Stuart, son of the deposed King. The new regime that “restored” the monarchy was an illegal and de facto power, unlawfully created as an act of war against the laws of Parliament and the will of the people. Thus, every British monarch since 1660 has ruled illegally and unconstitutionally.

For three and a half centuries, we have lived in the shadow of that imposed tyranny and its fraudulent and unlawful authority. In reality, the English Crown has no just or operable power, and never has had, since its legal abolition in the spring of 1649.

The aim of any patriot and adherent of the common law in England, Canada or any so-called “commonwealth” nation is to reclaim the lawful authority established by the Parliamentary Republic in England in 1649, and unseat the de facto corporate fiction known as the “crown of England” and its propaganda arm, the church of England and its master in Rome.

It is not only lawful and right to stand on the Republican constitution and laws of the original Commonwealth, but it is the requirement of God’s law that monarchy, like papacy, be abolished. The rule of one man or woman is antithetical to God’s authority, to natural law and the requirements of liberty, as enunciated in the First Commandment: “Thou shall have no other gods (authorities) before me” (1).

Monarchy, whether secular or religious, is idolatry, for it places one ruler, whether king or pope, as co-equal with God, beyond law or judgement. And when such a solitary ruler has also been found guilty of crimes against the people, their continued reign becomes intolerable.

In 1649, Charles I of England was lawfully convicted of waging a treasonous war against his own people. Elizabeth II of England has similarly been lawfully convicted of committing treason against her people and her coronation oath, and of participating personally in crimes against humanity. Accordingly, on February 25, 2013, Elizabeth Windsor was deposed from her office and ordered arrested by a lawful common law court of justice convened under the laws of England.

Because of this recent verdict, there exists no legal authority in Canada, England, or any Commonwealth nation. The laws of the “crown” are inoperative today, as are the oaths of allegiance taken to the Crown by every politician, judge, police officer and soldier in these nations. Therefore, in the absence of any authority, the opportunity has been created to re-establish the lawful and sovereign Republic constituted by the People in Parliament in 1649, whose laws have never lost their authority.

Despite this, out of fear or ignorance, many people raised under the fiction known as the “crown” still hesitate from seizing back their own power as sovereign men and women from the mistaken belief that the “crown” still is lawful and legitimate. The first task of any common law Republican movement is to educate the people through word and deed of their own God given natural liberty, and unite them in a new nation of equals.

This process has begun, through the rise of a common law movement to re-establish the rule of law and trial by jury in Canada, England, New Zealand and Australia. But common law courts now being formed in these countries lack a constitutional basis and thus, ultimate legitimacy, operating as they are in the present political vacuum of a discredited “crown” law that has not been replaced with a Republican constitution and nation. And so to attempt to create common law courts without the overarching political authority to do so is to place the cart before the horse by setting up courts that have no constitutional authority, and whose judgements can therefore be considered invalid.

It is for this reason that the efforts today to create common law courts in Canada, England, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand must be accompanied by a similar movement to establish, and re-establish, a constitutional Republic in these lands. For without such legitimating power behind the courts, one cannot honesty answer the question, “Where do you get the authority to convene common law courts?”.

In a nutshell, that authority derives from a Constitution established by free men and women gathered as equal sovereigns under God and the natural law: not under de facto rulers. This principle runs throughout centuries of common law verdicts in England, in which authority rests in the people gathered as “the Commons”, meaning within free political assemblies such as Parliament.

The Parliamentary Act establishing the High Court Act of January 4, 1649 stated “the King can not challenge the legitimacy of a court established solely by the Commons … for henceforth, monarchs may not preside over government according to divine ordainment or sovereign immunity”. In short, as of that date, the people were under to be the source of law, not kings or rulers:

“The Commons of England assembled in Parliament declare that the people under God are the origin of all just power … and have the supreme authority of the nation. Whatsoever is enacted and declared law by the Commons alone has the force of law … with or without the consent of the king.”

Applying this to today, no common law court we establish can be declared illegitimate by the “crown” as long as such courts rest on a Constitution ratified by the Commons: by the people in sovereign assembly. And it is such an Assembly that is gathering, in Canada, on October 27 in Winnipeg, to frame a new Constitution and Nation. And our colleagues in England, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand must take precisely the same step.

Future papers will discuss why the “Restoration” of the monarchy in England was fraudulent and invalid, and established a de facto government that has no operating or lawful authority, either then or now. Common law and Republican activists must be armed with this knowledge to re-educate the people once more in liberty, and fortify their efforts to actively reclaim the law and the land for a sovereign nation.

Issued 20 July, 2014 by The Provisional Council for the Republic of Kanata

republicofkanata@gmail.com

…………………………

(1) In Hebrew, the commandment’s even broader condemnation of all rival authorities is clear, as it reads, “Never will there be opposing rulers (eloyhim) over me.” Eloyhim refers not to a single god, but to a collective authority: any group of rulers or magistrates. The First Commandment specifically prohibits any higher authority than God and the divine law: all other authorities are below God, and subject to God’s law.Sources: The Tyrannicide Brief by Geoffrey Robertson (London, 2005); Constitutional Documents of the Puritan Revolution (Cambridge, 1906); Cromwell: Our Chief of Men (Antonia Fraser, 1972)

 

5-Minute Speech that got Judge Napolitano Fired from Fox News [video]

Thanks, Nick.

You know your country is in trouble when the only way you can go on television and tell the truth is to formulate the information as a question—and you STILL get fired!

Don’t worry, Judge, there’s a better place for you. You nailed it on every single point. Hopefully a few were listening and realize that you’re spelling “TYRANNY”.  ~ BP

 

After What This AZ Sheriff Just Said, the Federal Government Better Not Mess with Him [video]

That’s my Paul! Babeu has already taken a strong stance on gun control (sent Obama a letter saying he was supporting his Oath to the People to uphold the Constitution) and now he is butting heads again with the Federal Government over the Immigration fiasco as it affects us here in Pinal County.

Based on the above, I am hoping he will support The People’s Common Law Grand Jury team in removing corrupt law enforcement officials from the statutory justice system in Pinal County.

Sycamore Canyon/Mount Lemon are on the outskirts of Tucson, AZ.

Visit the source link to watch the video; the dialogue is below. Looks like the feds are screwing with the sheriffs to make a bad situation even worse. ~ BP

June 17th, 2014

Hundreds of people gathered at a remote desert location in Oracle, Arizona, early Tuesday to both protest and support the delivery of 40 to 60 illegal immigrant children to Sycamore Canyon Academy in the Catalina Mountains.  A press release had been circulated over the weekend that stated that the Department of Homeland Security would be off-loading unaccompanied minors in Pinal County.  Yet as the day wore on, it became apparent that the buses were not coming.

The Sheriff spoke with reporters at the intersection of Mt. Lemon and Webb Road near the boys’ ranch.

“These unaccompanied juveniles should be put on planes and returned to their country of origin and reunited with their families,” Babeu said.

When asked if he has been working with DHS, Sheriff Babeu said that he had been attempting to reach Jeh Johnson and other top officials by fax, email, and phone.

“There’s a lot of confusion,” Babeu continued. “Even here in Arizona.”

Babeu was told on Tuesday that the unaccompanied immigrants were not coming to the ranch.

“Who’s running this operation?” he asked rhetorically.  “This is where I am not only upset, I’m insulted by the lack of cooperation by the Federal Government.”

Source

 

VA Cites Progress on Backlog; Congress Disagrees

Thanks, Drake.

Forgive me if I sound naive, but if they REALLY wanted to catch up on the outrageous number of unprocessed claims, why wouldn’t they HIRE MORE PEOPLE???!!!!!  This isn’t rocket science!

The unemployment rates in America are deplorable, vets are  either dying or living in misery, homeless, in mental anguish—not to mention their families… and they CLAIM they made this much progress? Sorry, not buyin’ it. They lied about this just as they’ve lied about everything else.

The formal shadow government plan is to inflict as much misery and pain on Humanity as possible. All that matters to the government is that the VA executives get their big, fat bonuses.

Cut the red tape, get some people in there who care, hire a new workforce to assist the ones who know what they’re doing and can train, and GET IT DONE!

There is no excuse for this gross negligence of men and women who went to war in the name of freedom—no matter how misguided they were.  It’s criminal.  End the suffering!!! 

Stop stalling over unqualified claims and overpayments, for crying out loud. None of that will matter soon anyway.

The US government has stolen enough money from The People to cover every claim a thousand times over and in actuality should be tried for mass murder.

And soon they shall be.  ~ BP

Click here to watch the whistleblower’s video.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Department of Veterans Affairs says it has made “tremendous progress” in reducing a disability claims backlog that reached above 600,000 early last year. Members of Congress and the department’s assistant inspector general don’t believe it.

Allison Hickey, the VA’s undersecretary for benefits, told Congress that at the insistence of officials from President Barack Obama on down, the benefits backlog has been whittled down to about 275,000 — a 55 percent decrease from the peak.

Hickey’s claims were met with disbelief by some. Rep. Jeff Miller, R-Fla., chairman of the House Veterans Affairs Committee, told her flatly that he thinks the VA’s numbers are inaccurate.

“I don’t believe anybody at the table is telling the truth from the VA,” Miller said at a contentious hearing that lasted more than five hours Monday night. “I believe you are hiding numbers.”

Asked if she trusted numbers produced by VA, the agency’s assistant inspector general, Linda Halliday, said no.

“I don’t want to say I trust them,” Halliday said.

In a report issued earlier Monday, Halliday said that in its rush to reduce the backlog of disability claims, the VA has made benefits payments of more than $85 million to veterans who lacked adequate medical evidence that they deserve them. Without improvements, the VA could make unsupported payments to veterans totaling about $371 million over the next five years for claims of 100 percent disability alone, Halliday said.

The IG’s office also found widespread problems at VA regional offices in Philadelphia and Baltimore, including mail bins full of disability claims and associated evidence that had not been electronically scanned for three years.

“Improved financial stewardship at the agency is needed,” Halliday told the House veterans panel. “More attention is critical to minimize the financial risk of making inaccurate benefit payments.”

Special initiatives designed to remove older claims and speed processing of new claims are worthwhile, Halliday said, but in some cases they “have had an adverse impact on other workload areas” such as managing appeals filed by veterans and reducing overpayments to veterans.

Hickey defended her agency, saying the department has spent the past four years redesigning and streamlining the way it delivers benefits and services to veterans.

Last year, the Veterans Benefits Administration, which she oversees, completed a record 1.2 million disability rating claims, Hickey said. The agency is on track to complete more than 1.3 million rating claims this year and pay a total of $67 billion in benefits — about half the VA’s budget, Hickey said. More than 90 percent of the claims are being processed electronically, she said.

The VA has long struggled to cope with disability claims. The backlog intensified in recent years as more solders returned from Iraq and Afghanistan, and as the VA made it easier for Vietnam-era veterans to get disability compensation stemming from exposure to Agent Orange.

The VA has set a goal to process all claims within 125 days at 98 percent accuracy in 2015, but so far has fallen far short. The agency now processes most claims within 154 days — or more than five months — at a 90 percent accuracy rate, compared with an accuracy rate of 86 percent three years ago, Hickey said. At one point, veterans were forced to wait an average nine to 10 months for their disability claims to be processed.

“It has never been acceptable to VA … that our veterans are experiencing long delays in receiving the benefits they have earned and deserve,” Hickey said, adding that she was “saddened and offended” by related problems that have plagued VA health centers in recent months. Investigators have found long waits for appointments at VA hospitals and clinics, and falsified records to cover up the delays.

Halliday, in her report, said she found similar problems with the benefits agency, including faulty claims processing that “increases the risk of improper payments to veterans and their families.”

Inspectors surveying Philadelphia’s VA benefits center in June found mail bins brimming with claims and associated evidence dating to 2011 that had not been electronically scanned, she said.

Inspectors also found evidence that staffers at the Philadelphia regional office were manipulating dates to make old claims appear newer. The findings are similar to problems in which investigators have found long waits for appointments at VA hospitals and clinics, and falsified records to cover up the delays.

Read the rest of the article…

 

Supposedly from Ben Fulford (a Rumor) 7-15-14… “Bush Sr. passed away on Friday”

Starship Earth: The Big Picture:

Thanks, Guess he believed what he said about The People and what we would do if we found out what THEY did.

Originally posted on Kauilapele's Blog:

question_markFound this here. I have absolutely no confirmation of this, but I’m posting it anyway. This is a rumor at this stage, but according to an email supposedly from Ben, Bush Sr. is dead. Take with a grain of salt or two.

——————————————

Comment by patricia on July 15, 2014 @ 10:23 am

Looking like the Bush is dead rumor is right?

Here is an e-mail that Ben just sent me and asked me to post:

Hi XXX,

Could you please post this for the readers:

“Bush Sr passed away on Friday apparently from food poisoning, I hear bad fish. This has been confirmed via his personal security. It should hit the news sometime this week.”

The source works for a major charitable foundation and has been reliable in the past but I have yet to confirm this independently.

Benjamin Fulford 古歩道ベンジャミン

View original

At Least 40 UK Politicians Involved in Westminster ‘pedophile ring’

For those who are finding it difficult to believe… and those with head firmly implanted in the sands of denial… we’re not making this up. 

Let’s get these bastards before any more of them kick off of natural causes before they have to do any penance or suffer the embarrassment due them.  ~ BP

Editor’s note: as we have been reporting, this pedophile ring goes much deeper than just admitted pedophiles Jimmy Savile and Rolf Harris. With many people in high places involved, including the British Royal Family

A whistleblower who kicked off UK police pedophile probe Operation Fernbridge believes as many as 40 British MPs and peers were involved in or turned a blind eye to child abuse.

Peter Mckelvie, a retired child protection team manager, who has spent more than 20 years compiling evidence of alleged child abuse by people in authority, believes ten current and former politicians are on the list and that there is enough evidence to arrest at least one senior politician, reports the Daily Telegraph.

MPs and peers from all three main political parties are on the list including Cyril Smith and Sir Peter Morrison, who are now dead.

McKelvie was behind bringing Peter Righton, a notorious pedophile, to justice when he worked for Hereford and Worcester child protection team and believes that up to 20 MPs and Lords should be investigated.

“I believe there are sufficient grounds to carry out a formal investigation into allegations of up to 20 MPs and Lords over the last three decades, some still alive and some dead. The list is there,” he said.

And in a letter to his local MP Tony Baldry last month, McKelvie suggested that a further 20 may be implicated in covering up child abuse.

Members of UK Parliament

Members of Parliament are seen attending a session of Parliament in the House of Commons

 

Although he does not suggest that any of the public servants either MPs or Lords colluded with each other.

It was Tom Watson MP who first raised the issue of child abuse by MPs and peers at Prime Minister’s Questions in October 2012 as a result of information that McKelvie had passed to him.

Watson spoke of “clear intelligence suggesting a powerful pedophile network linked to parliament and number 10.”

It was after Watson’s intervention that the Metropolitan Police began Operation Fernbridge, an ongoing investigation about alleged child abuse at the Elms Guest House in Barns, South London.

It is understood that a Tory MP abused a child under the age of 10 at the guesthouse in the 1980s, but the alleged victim has so far refused to give a sworn witness statement to police.

Earlier this week it emerged that a separate file on an alleged Westminster pedophile network, which had been put together by the now deceased MP Geofrey Dickens, mysteriously gone missing after he handed it to the then Home Secretary Lord Brittan in 1983.

Labor MP Simon Danczuk, along with six other MPs, has written to the Home Secretary Theresa May demanding a public inquiry into the missing dossier and the people who had been named in it.

Palace of Westminster

The Palace of Westminster

 

Mrs May said she has not ruled out an inquiry after the police finish their investigations and Prime Minister Cameron also tried to give reassurance that the issue would not be swept under the carpet.

“I’ve asked the permanent secretary at the Home Office to do everything he can to find answers to all of these questions and to make sure we can reassure people about these events. Its right these investigations are made. We mustn’t do anything, of course, that could prejudice or prevent proper action by the police,” he said.

Separately it was reported Friday by the Telegraph that a senior Tory who is being investigated as part of Operation Fernbridge, was stopped by customs officials with child pornography in the 1980s but was never arrested.

Source: http://rt.com/uk/170672-uk-politicians-pedophile-ring/

Source

 

The Answer to Treasonous, Repressive Laws? Nullification! [video]

Sometimes the answers to seemingly impossible or complex problems are simple and right under our noses.

Humanity is beating the Illuminati at their own game with the laws that currently exist; peacefully and effectively.

Some states in America are already taking action to eliminate the treason, tyranny and oppression. Why not all? 

Check out the video below. Interesting stuff from Brasscheck TV and the Corbett Report.   ~ BP

 

“Nullification”

It’s one answer.

State governments can say “no” to federal insanity.

Texas got the ball rolling with the threat to criminalize the TSA. (too bad they dropped the ball on that one.)

Now Virginia is saying they won’t cooperate with Obama’s “jail anyone-anytime-anywhere”. [NDAA]

Hundreds of city councils also stated that they would not cooperate with the so-called Patriot Act.

How to Nullify the NSA (and every other tyrannical government agency)

Source

Epic: It Took Just 3 Minutes for Trey Gowdy to Shame an Entire Room of Journalists into Silence [video]

Epic, is right.  I’m STILL stuck on Hillary Clinton’s stunning demand: “What difference does it make?!”  I’ve never forgotten that callous question, but that’s a reptilian for you.  Socially inept psychopath.  ~ BP

Something Huge Just Happened and the Mainstream Media Is Ignoring It

Thanks Drake/Gramy J for sharing on Cosmic Voice FB.

To the average person, it would seem inconceivable that the lamestream media would simply leave this out, but it’s not in the government’s favour to air developments like this, so… silence ensues.

This happened end of March/beginning of April.

(Can you imagine what it will be like when the media actually tells us what’s going on?!)

Apparently the required number of states have now filed for “Constitutional Convention”.

If I recall correctly what I read recently, over the years it was very close, and two or three states subsequently reversed, but apparently reversals are not recognized or something to that effect, so now they’ve theoretically reached critical mass, and may possibly be legally in a position to do what needs to be done to take the country back, break free of the rogue federal government and make positive changes by mandate of The People and create a new Constitution that serves The People rather than the government—it’s original intent.

So, while we may need a magnifying glass to see some of what is going on behind the scenes, things ARE happening—albeit at a glacial pace—but the cabal is losing ground and the Light forces are advancing strongly on several fronts. 

I recommend reading the entire article.  ~ BP

 

 

April 7, 2014

You may be aware of Mark Levin’s book “The Liberty Amendments” released last year which called for a “Convention of the States”. Article 5 of the Constitution gives the several states the ability to convene a convention in which the Constitution may be amended, changed, or even scrapped.

The most important political development in 200 years was triggered last week, when the state legislature of Michigan became the 34th state to demand a “Constitutional Convention” in the United States. Under Article 5 of the US Constitution, if 2/3rds of the states call for such a convention, (meaning 34 states) it MUST take place.

During such a convention, the ENTIRE Constitution can be changed; nothing is off-limits. This would even allow the States to dismantle the federal government without its consent, and repudiate the debt which that government has incurred! When it voted for the convention last week, Michigan became the 34th state, thus meeting the requirement.

A goal has been reached behind what would be an unprecedented effort to amend the U.S. Constitution, through a little-known provision that gives states rather than Congress the power to initiate changes. This is the most significant political development in the entire world in the last 200 years.

At issue is what’s known as a “constitutional convention,” a scenario tucked into Article V of the U.S. Constitution. At its core, Article V provides two ways for amendments to be proposed. The first – which has been used for all 27 amendments to date – requires two-thirds of both the House and Senate to approve a resolution, before sending it to the states for ratification. The Founding Fathers, though, devised an alternative way which says if two-thirds of state legislatures demand a meeting, Congress “shall call a convention for proposing amendments.”

The idea has gained popularity among constitutional scholars in recent years — but got a big boost last week when Michigan lawmakers endorsed it.

Michigan matters, because by some counts it was the 34th state to do so. That makes two-thirds.

In the wake of the vote, California Republican Rep. Duncan Hunter pressed House Speaker John Boehner on today to determine whether the states just crossed the threshold for this kind of convention. Like Michigan lawmakers, Hunter’s interest in the matter stems from a desire to push a balanced-budget amendment — something that could be done at a constitutional convention.

Read the rest of the article…

 

Putin Stands Up to the NWO? [video]

It’s interesting, the opposing feelings about Putin. Personally, I’ve had a very good feeling about ol’ Vlad all along and believe he is truly working to eliminate the dark cabal and set the world free.

I love a politician who calls a spade, a spade and won’t stand down or fold under pressure—particularly to a bully like the US cabal. He also needs to stay alive, however. Not much good to us if he gets suicided, disappeared or assassinated—another Kennedy.

Cobra reiterated in his most recent interview from April 8th that Obama, while he incarnated with the intent to work on the side of the Light, has been so threatened—as well as his family—that he is no longer playing on the Light team. Can’t say I blame him. 

No matter what, the drama will play out in our favour despite the program having deviated from its original form. 

The video below is from 2012, so I think Putin had wrapped his head around the true situation already.  ~ BP

From Kerry Cassidy’s blog…

  • 30 Mar 2014 12:32
  • Written by Kerry Cassidy

In this speech… as one source put it:  “Putin stands up to the NWO, and explains why their assault on the principle of national sovereignty to take over the world is completely unacceptable”…

The question is, while fighting for national sovereignty is this one man playing his designated role as assigned by the Illuminati… top of the triangle, very well… Or does he passionately believe that the NWO is wrong?  While Obama plays the bad guy and Putin plays the good guy do we just move along down the road to a One World Government?  The eagle… two wings one head.

Uploaded on 25 Feb 2012

Putin’s speech on 10 February 2007 at 43rd Munich Security Conference.exposes the NWO

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH0eHekt84g

 

If you’d like to learn more about Putin, here’s a documentary shared in the video comments.  ~ BP

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5Rkom1RpKA